+ Reply to Thread
Results 16 to 18 of 18
Discussion: Natural Selection / Natural Selection - General Discussion - Take The 3.2 Down? Or Port The 3.1 Over to 3.2? - Aero's right guys. We shouldn't port because of a minor non game effecting bug.
-
12-15-2006, 06:24 PM #16
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Toronto
- Age
- 24
- Posts
- 296
Re: Take The 3.2 Down? Or Port The 3.1 Over to 3.2?
Aero's right guys. We shouldn't port because of a minor non game effecting bug.
-
12-15-2006, 08:05 PM #17
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Age
- 28
- Posts
- 3,850
Re: Take The 3.2 Down? Or Port The 3.1 Over to 3.2?
But considering we DO obviously have significant disagreement on this, and we also expect the next beta to be out in the near future with significant improvements, is it that terrible of an idea to leave 3.1 functioning at least until we see what 3.2b2 looks like?
-
12-15-2006, 09:41 PM #18
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 905
Re: Take The 3.2 Down? Or Port The 3.1 Over to 3.2?
It may be a minor non-game-affecting bug but it provides a huge headache for administration. Demos become useless or very difficult to use as a reliable log of server happenings and speccing general server activity or specific problematic player activity via HLTV becomes near impossible.
Originally Posted by ChopStick
Cool! Personalized plates! Barclay, Barry, Bert, Bort...come on...Bort?
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Bookmarks