Welcome to Tactical Gamer

Discussion: Project Reality / PR:BF2 - PR Dev Journal. - Originally Posted by Craz3y|Assasin I think the Americans get a little of an overkill. I
  1. 10-03-2008, 03:24 AM #751
    Ghost Dog
    Ghost Dog is offline

    Ghost Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,851

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by Craz3y|Assasin View Post
    I think the Americans get a little of an overkill.
    I agree... looks like another hell for insurgents unless they get RPG 's on every block.

    Quote Originally Posted by llPANCHOll View Post
    I think the Cache system for insurgent maps ends up being like an Easter Egg hunt, and once people memorize where the caches are the fun just runs right out of it. I for one would like to see new life breathed into the the Insurgency Maps by adding an AAS mode, if a server chose to run them that way, they could.
    Agreed again. I haven't played enough insurgency to know where the caches are, if I find one cache in an entire round I 'm happy. I 've spent hours as US searching blocks on these maps and tbh I have found 1 cache myself so far. Some people seem to know exactly where the caches are, I 've played rounds on Ramiel where every cache was destroyed within minutes after it was revealed...

    I don't wanna sound too negative but this really isn't the type of map I 'm waiting for. I 'd rather see another combined forces map like Kashan or Qinling.

    Seriously... 2 Apaches, 2 Abrams??? I 'm pretty sure this won't be the final setup.
    |TG-6th|GhostDog
    Xfire: Iaintyourm8 | Ingame: |TG-6th|GhostDog | Steam: Zuigmijnballen

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    2.  
  2. 10-03-2008, 03:27 AM #752
    sirsolo
    sirsolo is offline

    sirsolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    721

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost Dog View Post
    I agree... looks like another hell for insurgents unless they get RPG 's on every block.

    Agreed again. I haven't played enough insurgency to know where the caches are, if I find one cache in an entire round I 'm happy. I 've spent hours as US searching blocks on these maps and tbh I have found 1 cache myself so far. Some people seem to know exactly where the caches are, I 've played rounds on Ramiel where every cache was destroyed within minutes after it was revealed...

    I don't wanna sound too negative but this really isn't the type of map I 'm waiting for. I 'd rather see another combined forces map like Kashan or Qinling.

    Seriously... 2 Apaches, 2 Abrams??? I 'm pretty sure this won't be the final setup.

    Ive take a bunch of randoms into Ramiel, a map I Havn't played before then, and destroyed 3 Caches.

    Its all about going for the ones that arn't marked yet.

    ~Sirsolo
    |TG-Irr|Sirsolo since 18OCT08.

    Carpe Diem

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    3.  
  3. 10-03-2008, 05:55 PM #753
    Belhade
    Belhade is offline

    Belhade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York (no, not the city)
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,512

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Karbala, huh? They should get rid of the heavy armor and replace them with Chenworths.

    What, haven't you seen Three Kings?

    Walter: Ma'am, STEP AWAY FROM THE CHENWORTH!
    [Adriana Drives Off]
    Walter: Ma'am! OH PLEASE! OH PLEASE STOP!

    |TG-6th|Belhade
    "I am actually looking forward to watching Jon and Kate plus 8." - Dirtboy




    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    4.  

     
  4. 10-03-2008, 05:59 PM #754
    Waldo_II
    Waldo_II is offline

    Waldo_II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    /home/minnesota
    Posts
    1,000

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    The Apache is a bad idea. It can just hover over the cache and fire its 30 down until it destroys the cache. If the ground forces have a good idea of where it is, then the Apache can fire a couple hellfire missiles down there.

    People always lose the SA-7 quickly as insurgent. The Apaches should have no problem, with flares and only one responsible SA-7 insurgent out there.
    |TG-XV| Waldo_II
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    5.  
  5. 10-03-2008, 11:46 PM #755
    MarineSeaknight
    MarineSeaknight is offline

    MarineSeaknight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,925

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by Waldo_II View Post
    The Apache is a bad idea. It can just hover over the cache and fire its 30 down until it destroys the cache. If the ground forces have a good idea of where it is, then the Apache can fire a couple hellfire missiles down there.

    People always lose the SA-7 quickly as insurgent. The Apaches should have no problem, with flares and only one responsible SA-7 insurgent out there.
    This was the response when they announced there could be attack aircraft on the map, Sangin. I remember a response being that the caches could be put underground, where airstrikes of any kind cannot damage.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    6.  
  6. 10-04-2008, 12:16 AM #756
    Mobius007
    Mobius007 is offline

    Mobius007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    182

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by MarineSeaknight View Post
    This was the response when they announced there could be attack aircraft on the map, Sangin. I remember a response being that the caches could be put underground, where airstrikes of any kind cannot damage.
    That's a good idea... underground tunnel system leading to them possibly?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    7.  

     
  7. 10-04-2008, 01:01 AM #757
    llPANCHOll
    llPANCHOll is offline

    llPANCHOll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma City, Ok
    Age
    40
    Posts
    2,995

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    I doubt it, more like the underground area's currently on Al Basrah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    8.  
  8. 10-04-2008, 01:36 AM #758
    Waldo_II
    Waldo_II is offline

    Waldo_II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    /home/minnesota
    Posts
    1,000

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by llPANCHOll View Post
    I doubt it, more like the underground area's currently on Al Basrah
    I would like very much to see these Al Basrah tunnels...

    You probably mean Korengal. I don't think the Devs will want to model a whole new set of caves, so they probably will be using some of Korengal's.
    |TG-XV| Waldo_II
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    9.  
  9. 10-04-2008, 01:37 AM #759
    Sonic
    Sonic is offline

    Sonic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Age
    18
    Posts
    1,723

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    or possibly like the caves on korengal.
    |TG|Sonic


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    10.  

     
  10. 10-04-2008, 02:30 AM #760
    llPANCHOll
    llPANCHOll is offline

    llPANCHOll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma City, Ok
    Age
    40
    Posts
    2,995

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    There are no caves on Al Basrah, or tunnels.. There are several rooms underground. I would not hold your breath for anything super cool like a system of tunnels or anything of that nature, on this new map.
    Last edited by llPANCHOll; 10-04-2008 at 03:05 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    11.  
  11. 10-05-2008, 06:40 AM #761
    [R-PUB]bosco
    [R-PUB]bosco is offline

    [R-PUB]bosco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    271

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Chuc View Post
    .85 Animation WIP Showreel


    http://www.wegame.com/watch/0_85_Pro...S_IS_MY_RIFLE/
    ..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    12.  
  12. 10-05-2008, 10:58 AM #762
    browna3
    browna3 is offline

    browna3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Leicester, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
    Age
    21
    Posts
    2,987
    Blog Entries
    27

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    god damit bosco your teasing us again!


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    13.  

     
  13. 10-05-2008, 12:53 PM #763
    Waldo_II
    Waldo_II is offline

    Waldo_II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    /home/minnesota
    Posts
    1,000

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Oh yes oh yes oh yes!!

    Check out the aimpoint at 0:10/0:12/0:28!


    And the new AK and SKS with wider rear sights is in...
    |TG-XV| Waldo_II
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    14.  
  14. 10-05-2008, 01:56 PM #764
    IronTaxi
    IronTaxi is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    13

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by llPANCHOll View Post
    There are no caves on Al Basrah, or tunnels.. There are several rooms underground. I would not hold your breath for anything super cool like a system of tunnels or anything of that nature, on this new map.
    Yeah not on this map anyway..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    15.  
  15. 10-05-2008, 02:53 PM #765
    kevlarorc
    kevlarorc is offline

    kevlarorc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,481

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Hellz yes! the aimpoint is clear now! wootiwootness...


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    16.  

     
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules



  
 

Back to top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0


©2004-2011 - Tactical Industries, LLC - All Rights Reserved
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 AM.