Welcome to Tactical Gamer

Discussion: Project Reality / PR:BF2 - PR Dev Journal. -
  1. 04-17-2009, 12:18 AM #1426
    Waldo_II
    Waldo_II is offline

    Waldo_II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    /home/minnesota
    Posts
    1,000

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    |TG-XV| Waldo_II
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    2.  
  2. 04-17-2009, 07:15 AM #1427
    Berlancic
    Berlancic is offline

    Berlancic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia, Brisbane - best city in Oz.
    Age
    16
    Posts
    1,406

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Doesn't the abrams in real life have technology allowing the tank commander to spot the target and align the gun to it automatically so the gunner can just shoot immediately... or is the other way round... or am I wrong.

    I wonder about involving NATO into PR? If it hasn't already been tried... I just want to play with a Leopard tank, (germany is in NATO right).
    |TG-69th|Berlancic2
    "Speed. Aggression. Surprise."


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    3.  
  3. 04-17-2009, 11:10 AM #1428
    Pwn3ge
    Pwn3ge is offline

    Pwn3ge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    849

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by MarineSeaknight View Post
    What about THAT one over there?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    4.  

     
  4. 04-17-2009, 11:28 AM #1429
    Ghost Dog
    Ghost Dog is offline

    Ghost Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,851

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Lets not turn this into a SPAM thread shall we.
    |TG-6th|GhostDog
    Xfire: Iaintyourm8 | Ingame: |TG-6th|GhostDog | Steam: Zuigmijnballen

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    5.  
  5. 04-17-2009, 03:19 PM #1430
    Charity Case
    Charity Case is offline

    Charity Case's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Age
    25
    Posts
    878

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Yeah, please stop the spam.

    Quote Originally Posted by Berlancic View Post
    Doesn't the abrams in real life have technology allowing the tank commander to spot the target and align the gun to it automatically so the gunner can just shoot immediately... or is the other way round... or am I wrong.

    I wonder about involving NATO into PR? If it hasn't already been tried... I just want to play with a Leopard tank, (germany is in NATO right).
    You're right about the Abrams, and I'm pretty sure that most other modern tanks have the same features. Also, there is a German faction being developed for PR. They were featured in the Dev Journal a couple of months ago.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    6.  
  6. 04-17-2009, 04:14 PM #1431
    Delta*RandyShugart*
    Delta*RandyShugart* is offline


    Delta*RandyShugart*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Good ol Suburbia in Southern Westchester County NY
    Posts
    6,091
    Blog Entries
    49

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    ZEEEEEEEEEEEEE German's are coming!!

    That might be a bit strange, wanting the help of the German Luftwaffe.
    Randy = Ace ! - Warlab






    Randy/Bob/Magnum
    RSS Feeds:Bamboo | |TG-31st| LR IHS Info | 9/11 - Never Forget |
    Apophis - "TG was created to cater to a VERY specific type of gamer rather than trying to appeal to the greater gaming population.
    Tactical Gamer is not mainstream.
    We are not trying to attract mainstream gamers."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    7.  

     
  7. 04-17-2009, 04:19 PM #1432
    warpig1292
    warpig1292 is offline

    warpig1292's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Santa Cruz, Ca
    Age
    19
    Posts
    766

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by Berlancic View Post
    Doesn't the abrams in real life have technology allowing the tank commander to spot the target and align the gun to it automatically so the gunner can just shoot immediately... or is the other way round... or am I wrong.

    I wonder about involving NATO into PR? If it hasn't already been tried... I just want to play with a Leopard tank, (germany is in NATO right).

    If it aligned automatically that would kind of ruin the fun of PR. There are some things that are meant not to be realistic
    |TG-31st| WarPig1292




    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    8.  
  8. 04-17-2009, 06:23 PM #1433
    Skud
    Skud is offline


    Skud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    NY
    Age
    21
    Posts
    8,042
    Blog Entries
    15

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by SamO View Post
    Everyone has an opinion skud.
    Opinion on flight mechanics of jet aircraft != Facts on flight mechanics of jet aircraft.
    |TG-70th|Skud
    I just hipfire and get headshots at medium range - xBadger, the best player

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    9.  
  9. 04-17-2009, 06:29 PM #1434
    Axis_Sniper
    Axis_Sniper is offline


    Axis_Sniper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    21
    Posts
    2,584

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    I think they should try to include more factions.

    I think they should also do like a joint-op map. Where US and British Forces vs. China, or Chinese and MEC forces vs. US. Or something like that. Sounds a little far fetched, I know. But one can only dream.


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    10.  

     
  10. 04-17-2009, 07:52 PM #1435
    Berlancic
    Berlancic is offline

    Berlancic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia, Brisbane - best city in Oz.
    Age
    16
    Posts
    1,406

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by warpig1292 View Post
    If it aligned automatically that would kind of ruin the fun of PR. There are some things that are meant not to be realistic
    Yeah I know, you would not need any skill. I was just asking if the abrams actually had that in real life.
    |TG-69th|Berlancic2
    "Speed. Aggression. Surprise."


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    11.  
  11. 04-18-2009, 02:19 PM #1436
    Skud
    Skud is offline


    Skud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    NY
    Age
    21
    Posts
    8,042
    Blog Entries
    15

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by Axis_Sniper View Post
    I think they should try to include more factions.

    I think they should also do like a joint-op map. Where US and British Forces vs. China, or Chinese and MEC forces vs. US. Or something like that. Sounds a little far fetched, I know. But one can only dream.
    I like this idea, too. Theoretically should be possible. Just make the spawn selection screen include both faction's riflemen, etc...

    Problem I foresee is voice commands. Having one faction with both british and American voice packs?
    |TG-70th|Skud
    I just hipfire and get headshots at medium range - xBadger, the best player

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    12.  
  12. 04-18-2009, 08:02 PM #1437
    NerdyDodge
    NerdyDodge is offline

    NerdyDodge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Worcestershire, England
    Age
    21
    Posts
    449

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheSkudDestroyer View Post
    I like this idea, too. Theoretically should be possible. Just make the spawn selection screen include both faction's riflemen, etc...

    Problem I foresee is voice commands. Having one faction with both british and American voice packs?
    Clearly we need to include some exasperated american troops arguing with the stupid british too! No war film/game is complete without it.

    [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh2CserJuUE[/media]

    See from about 4.30 to 5.40.



    'Forward, the Light Brigade!
    Charge for the guns' he said:
    Into the valley of Death
      Rode the six hundred.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    13.  

     
  13. 04-18-2009, 08:39 PM #1438
    Axis_Sniper
    Axis_Sniper is offline


    Axis_Sniper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    21
    Posts
    2,584

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Not to get too off-topic, but I love Band Of Brothers. One of the greatest mini-series ever. I would say it's THE best, but Generation Kill gives it a run for its money.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheSkudDestroyer View Post
    I like this idea, too. Theoretically should be possible. Just make the spawn selection screen include both faction's riflemen, etc...

    Problem I foresee is voice commands. Having one faction with both british and American voice packs?
    Yeah, give the voice pack/model for the kit that goes with the faction. Include it all in one screen. Hell, just to make it more far-fetched, maybe get a 2nd commander? The only thing I saw drawing conflicts is which faction gets the requestables.


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    14.  
  14. 04-18-2009, 09:13 PM #1439
    Sabre_Tooth_Tigger
    Sabre_Tooth_Tigger is offline

    Sabre_Tooth_Tigger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    eurasia
    Posts
    3,588
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    We dont need two factions to get mistakes like that, its in the game now

    'Fire at the tree trunks with heat'
    'Theres no one there'
    'fire anyway'
    'I cant see anyone to fire at'
    'fire with heat at the trees, I dont care if you see them or not'
    #gunner uses coaxial
    #facepalm
    #Insurgent fires rpg at apc
    /fin


    If you find yourself in a fair fight, then you have obviously failed to plan properly.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    15.  
  15. 04-18-2009, 10:16 PM #1440
    gijoe
    gijoe is offline

    gijoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,848

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    I think last time i read about two forces, it was said undo able. Which doesnt make sense two have two (as cool as it would be) because then it would be 15 of each, and that would be kinda lame. Other things come into play too like who gets to play on what team, and stuff like that.


    Do you really want invincible bears running around raping your churches and burning your women?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    16.  

     
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules



  
 

Back to top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0


©2004-2011 - Tactical Industries, LLC - All Rights Reserved
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 AM.