Welcome to Tactical Gamer

Discussion: Project Reality / PR:BF2 - PR Dev Journal. - Also it would lose the realism. For example a brittish crewman crewing with an American
  1. 04-18-2009, 10:23 PM #1441
    warpig1292
    warpig1292 is offline

    warpig1292's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Santa Cruz, Ca
    Age
    19
    Posts
    766

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Also it would lose the realism.

    For example a brittish crewman crewing with an American crewman. They must have different terms ect. Also will a US crewman know how to drive/gun in a challenger and vise versa. It just wont really work out..

    I dont think it is possible to have 2 commanders also what would the point be. IF you did get 2 they would probably at some point coordinate against eachother
    |TG-31st| WarPig1292




    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    2.  
  2. 04-18-2009, 10:32 PM #1442
    Axis_Sniper
    Axis_Sniper is offline


    Axis_Sniper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    21
    Posts
    2,584

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by warpig1292 View Post
    Also it would lose the realism.

    For example a brittish crewman crewing with an American crewman. They must have different terms ect. Also will a US crewman know how to drive/gun in a challenger and vise versa. It just wont really work out..

    I dont think it is possible to have 2 commanders also what would the point be. IF you did get 2 they would probably at some point coordinate against eachother
    This game stopped being realistic when you could be revived with an adrenaline shot after a HEAT round hits your ass.

    Anyway, it could be where the Americans would get their own vehicles as well as the British.


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    3.  
  3. 04-18-2009, 10:58 PM #1443
    warpig1292
    warpig1292 is offline

    warpig1292's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Santa Cruz, Ca
    Age
    19
    Posts
    766

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by Axis_Sniper View Post
    This game stopped being realistic when you could be revived with an adrenaline shot after a HEAT round hits your ass.

    Anyway, it could be where the Americans would get their own vehicles as well as the British.
    I dont think that it would be possible to not let a US soldier into brit armor. I dont think that it is codeable in the engine
    |TG-31st| WarPig1292




    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    4.  

     
  4. 04-18-2009, 11:21 PM #1444
    thegreatnardini
    thegreatnardini is offline


    thegreatnardini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    the danger zone
    Posts
    3,825

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by warpig1292 View Post
    I dont think that it would be possible to not let a US soldier into brit armor. I dont think that it is codeable in the engine
    The Bradleys were used by the British as a placeholder in 0.7 Quinling. The map loading screen said something about "US AA support."

    lTG-6thl NardDawg


    OK, runner ups get 3 months free SM and the winner gets a custom 2012 Dodge Charger with TG decals, built in dashboard laptop with TG as the homepage and an aquarium built into the steering wheel that's filled with japanese fighting fish. - Axis

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    5.  
  5. 04-18-2009, 11:33 PM #1445
    Wicks
    Wicks is offline


    Wicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Winning!
    Posts
    4,251
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Im just waiting for the complaints of 'Faction Switching' on the same team to start!
    TG PR Admins: Fighting for YOU on the frontlines in the War on Stupidity.
    |TG-6th|Wickens




    Being Ninja and Lone Wolfing FOB's is what PR:BF is all about, right?....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    6.  
  6. 04-19-2009, 12:08 AM #1446
    creepin
    creepin is offline

    creepin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Bethesda MD
    Posts
    1,237

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by Axis_Sniper View Post
    I think they should try to include more factions.

    I think they should also do like a joint-op map. Where US and British Forces vs. China, or Chinese and MEC forces vs. US. Or something like that. Sounds a little far fetched, I know. But one can only dream.


    thats a SP-DEV wink

    Life's too short to live it fast.




    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    7.  

     
  7. 04-19-2009, 02:49 AM #1447
    MarineSeaknight
    MarineSeaknight is offline

    MarineSeaknight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,925

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by warpig1292 View Post
    I dont think that it would be possible to not let a US soldier into brit armor. I dont think that it is codeable in the engine
    Sure you can. Just teamlock the tank to the team you want.

    You could have Iraqi Insurgents driving around in an M1 Abrams if you coded it the right way.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    8.  
  8. 04-19-2009, 03:14 AM #1448
    Axis_Sniper
    Axis_Sniper is offline


    Axis_Sniper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    21
    Posts
    2,584

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    I can imagine the Devs adding a sound file for people getting into armor that isn't part of their faction

    "How the hell do you drive this?!?!"
    "Jesus how the hell am I driving this thing!?!"
    "afjsbfoseifbaofb" (This would be a mix between gargling and screaming. Don't ask me why is caring about his dental hygiene at this moment, it just is.)


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    9.  
  9. 04-19-2009, 04:27 PM #1449
    Googol
    Googol is offline

    Googol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Bethlehem, PA
    Posts
    1,435

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Hans Martin Slayer View Post
    Today, i proudly present to you my first map that will make appearance in PR 0.9.

    i've been working on this project for about 1.5 years now and i've learned a lot during this time so i hope to continue contibuting maps for PR in the future.

    - thanks to everyone who commented on my work so far, giving crits etc. that's much appreciated. special thanks go out to rhino for all the helpful pr mapping tuts.

    like many guys i started this project in the community modding section and got promoted to R-CON after a while until i got finally upgraded to DEV.
    for those who are interested, that's how it started,
    it looked pretty crappy back then :-P: http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f354...fghan-map.html


    let's get straight onto the facts:

    - Lashkar Valley, Southern Afghanistan.

    - Size: 2km

    - Gamemodes: Insurgency/ Skirmish

    - Assets: Mechanized Infantry/ Light Vehicles

    - Teams: German Forces vs Taliban - this might be subject to change, depends if the GF will be ready for 0.9.




    MINIMAP




    INGAME:

    The map looks beautiful, but alas, it's another Insurgency...
    Googol

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    10.  

     
  10. 04-19-2009, 04:33 PM #1450
    creepin
    creepin is offline

    creepin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Bethesda MD
    Posts
    1,237

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    mhhh, i got to see this map 5 months ago, and i must say, it looks even awesomer now, even though it really looked awesome back then too.

    Life's too short to live it fast.




    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    11.  
  11. 04-19-2009, 04:39 PM #1451
    creepin
    creepin is offline

    creepin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Bethesda MD
    Posts
    1,237

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    some more dev sauce, enjoy!:



    By creepinshadow at 2009-04-19


    By creepinshadow at 2009-04-19


    By creepinshadow at 2009-04-19



    By creepinshadow at 2009-04-19


    note that these were still WIP shots.

    Life's too short to live it fast.




    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    12.  
  12. 04-19-2009, 08:10 PM #1452
    Axis_Sniper
    Axis_Sniper is offline


    Axis_Sniper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    21
    Posts
    2,584

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    That map looks great, and if they are able to get the GF out by .9 it would be fantastic.


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    13.  

     
  13. 04-19-2009, 08:27 PM #1453
    Paine
    Paine is offline

    Paine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    350
    Blog Entries
    10

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    Quote Originally Posted by Axis_Sniper View Post
    That map looks great, and if they are able to get the GF out by .9 it would be fantastic.
    Damn girl friends, always taking time away from PR.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    14.  
  14. 04-20-2009, 03:22 AM #1454
    Ghost Dog
    Ghost Dog is offline

    Ghost Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,851

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    If that 's the final view distance, it 's gonna be sniper paradise.

    I 'd rather see some more non-insurgency maps though, but if this introduces the German Forces, I guess I can live with it .
    |TG-6th|GhostDog
    Xfire: Iaintyourm8 | Ingame: |TG-6th|GhostDog | Steam: Zuigmijnballen

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    15.  
  15. 04-20-2009, 03:31 AM #1455
    Axis_Sniper
    Axis_Sniper is offline


    Axis_Sniper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    21
    Posts
    2,584

    Re: PR Dev Journal.

    I'm just throwing out another idea here, so stick with me on this.

    I was thinking of giving the Iraqi Insurgents 1 ticket for every civie that is killed. So instead of the Coalition only needing to destroy the 10 caches, they would need to destroy all 12 if they kill enough civies. If tickets go beyond the 20 needed for the final 2 caches, it would begin to bleed after the final cache is destroyed.

    It would help on Iraqis Insurgents just throwing their lives away, keep the Coalition on their toes/less trigger happy, as well as keep in touch with the realism.


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    16.  

     
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules



  
 

Back to top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0


©2004-2011 - Tactical Industries, LLC - All Rights Reserved
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 AM.