Welcome to Tactical Gamer

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 37
Discussion: Project Reality / PR:BF2 - US Army Update Part 1 - 2nd row, middle picture...forward sight is WAAYYY to big. : )
  1. #16

    Jimmy_Smack's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    116

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    2nd row, middle picture...forward sight is WAAYYY to big. : )

  2.  
  3. #17

    ollie_fool's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    947

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    Excellent job guys, keep it up.

  4.  
  5. #18

    Charity Case's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Age
    25
    Posts
    878

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy_Smack View Post
    2nd row, middle picture...forward sight is WAAYYY to big. : )
    Pretty sure that's a perspective thing.

    Anyway, thanks for posting this bosco, the US Army looks great! My only big question is if the new HMMWV will have six seats (the previous USI model only had five)? Also, anyone else notice that the M68 Aimpoint is in? I would love to see that on more than just the spec. ops. rifle.

    I know it's been talked to death over on the PR forums, but it would be nice to see the Stryker (which looks incredibly good) with slat armor and Mk19 variants. Anyway, I'm really looking forward to part 2 of this update, not to mention .8!

  6.  

     
  7. #19

    206 Wolfpack's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,221

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    I've got to say, the work done there is pretty sexy..

    Questions:

    Will Driver and gunner of the stryker be looking at a screen while shooting (like driver of stryker in arma) or will it be like tanks and other apcs so far in PR?

    and you think you could put on a reflex sight for the rifleman w/o a scope? Keeping the other kits with regular iron sights? (talking about the square reflex sights, like in that one COD 4 night mission)

  8.  
  9. #20

    Pistolfied's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    939

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    God, I hope the guns won't have extremely unrealistic kick that only a 10 year old would receive (like the g3). Hell, I hope the g3 can be fired full auto and still have great accuracy (compared to now).

    Damnit Blizzard, fix ZvT already >.<
    In Soviet Russian, Arma admins are nice to you!

  10.  
  11. #21

    Sabre_Tooth_Tigger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    eurasia
    Posts
    3,588
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    I still prefer the auto of the AK101 when Im playing MEC but they shouldn't make the G3 any more lethal. Dont use full auto unless you have to or they are in your face especially when they definitly wont increase the 20 mag, that alone makes it a bad use of the gun

    Will the US army DMR get a m21


    If you find yourself in a fair fight, then you have obviously failed to plan properly.

  12.  

     
  13. #22

    Taip3n's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    972

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    Can't say I've fired a G3 in real life but I know even a Browning has a kick on it like a runaway rabbit when your holding it by the legs. The pistols seem tame here. The SLR (7.62 old British rifle that looks alot like the G3) I have fired and that kicked. To me the G3 on auto is as it would be on auto. Iron sights, up close and personal, is the way forward. Always a medic is handy.

    The AK's I'm still having trouble with just aiming and that was my personal favourate once upon a time (noobtuber that I am). I am hoping this 'blur' I seem to get nowadays will go in the update so I can once again haunt the US presence and their new toys ^^ (though the G3 is good enough <grins> ).

  14.  
  15. #23

    Pistolfied's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    939

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr14_2Z2m0A[/media]
    [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZAWZIAwpeI[/media]
    [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xC7Wokz36I[/media]

    you can at least fire a burst off without it hitting you in the head like it currently does.

    Damnit Blizzard, fix ZvT already >.<
    In Soviet Russian, Arma admins are nice to you!

  16.  
  17. #24

    [R-PUB]bosco's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    271

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by Charity Case View Post
    My only big question is if the new HMMWV will have six seats (the previous USI model only had five)?
    Not yet decided afaik.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenian420 View Post
    Questions:

    Will Driver and gunner of the stryker be looking at a screen while shooting (like driver of stryker in arma) or will it be like tanks and other apcs so far in PR?

    and you think you could put on a reflex sight for the rifleman w/o a scope? Keeping the other kits with regular iron sights?
    Like tanks and other APCs.

    ---

    You mean an EoTech?
    It's unlikely .

    Quote Originally Posted by Sabre_Tooth_Tigger View Post
    Will the US army DMR get a m21
    As I said, M14.

  18.  

     
  19. #25


    Skud's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    NY
    Age
    21
    Posts
    8,044
    Blog Entries
    15

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    I have no problem using bursts with G3. I just don't advise it. It's situational.

  20.  
  21. #26

    Mix0lydian's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    467

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    the question is not whether the Army gets the M14 or M21, as both are pretty similar in appearance and M14's are pretty common as DMR's in Army infantry units.

    the question is whether the USMC DMR is introduced. It's basically an accurized M14 w/ a McMillan fiberglass stock. Frontline Marine units deploy with this rifle, not the current M14 in-game.

    this is however low priority compared to other things like GL M16a4 and L85

    the recoil of the G3 is fine

  22.  
  23. #27

    Sabre_Tooth_Tigger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    eurasia
    Posts
    3,588
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    Oh yea, hoping all the GL have scopes next version

    Kat you cant expect everything to be literally true. Just for a laugh, here is what I want the US army to counter your full auto accurate G3 with, saw is so yesterday
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3zjqMq59tI&fmt=18

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmK-5V5ZNTc
    Last edited by Sabre_Tooth_Tigger; 06-08-2008 at 08:29 PM.


    If you find yourself in a fair fight, then you have obviously failed to plan properly.

  24.  

     
  25. #28

    gijoe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,852

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    Very nice apc's! This is gonna be a great release. Although i hate you all for giving us updates because now i CANT WAIT! Its torture!!!!!


    Do you really want invincible bears running around raping your churches and burning your women?

  26.  
  27. #29

    206 Wolfpack's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,221

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    What about a javelin that locked on for the marines? HAT would definitely have a whole new meaning...

  28.  
  29. #30

    Sabre_Tooth_Tigger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    eurasia
    Posts
    3,588
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: US Army Update Part 1

    Have a look at this list:
    already-suggested-suggestions


    F3 in firefox lets you search it quick with a keyword, javelin is on there sorry


    If you find yourself in a fair fight, then you have obviously failed to plan properly.

  30.  

     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


  
 

Back to top