There are several things to consider here.

First is the ruleset. Disposable made an excellent post outlining the rule very clearly. If theres no commander, the assets are first come first served. If people steal them, it cant really be helped. No orders have been given and therefore there is no disobedience going on. However, there is a matter of courtesy to consider. If you have someone waiting in line for an asset, it's generally common courtesy to let them have it instead of serving your "i want it now" impulse.

Second, there is selfishness. Lets be realistic about it here folks. You join the server and the map is Qwai. There is already a TOW squad, but no commander. But you WANT the tow for yourself, so you create your own TOW squad, which you KNOW is going to be a confrontational act. Why? Why purposefully create antagonism on the server? Not only are you creating a bigger workload for the admins by purposefully throwing a wrench into things, but you're also acting quite immaturely. It's selfish and it's what I like to call Veruca Salt syndrome (for those that dont understand the reference, go watch Willy Wonka...Veruca Salt was the little girl who had to have everything she wanted or she pitched a fit).

Third, there is the strategy angle. Ok, so we have a three man tow squad. That gives us one driver, one gunner, one engineer. It also leaves one TOW humvee in reserve in case the first gets nuked. This is a far more effective strategy than having them both out in the field and vulnerable. Think strategically folks. We're not called TacticalGamer for nothing.

Now let me give a personal analysis:
Sure, everyone has a right to the assets. Thats a given. But lets be adult about it folks. If you join up on the server and you see that although there is no commander but people have formed asset squads, try and put your own wants behind the needs of the team for once. Go be an infantry squad. Find yourself another useful position. By creating your own asset squad, youre provoking antagonism, acting childish, and wasting valuable time for your team by sitting at main (or wherever) and fighting over the assets.

Do TG members get assets a majority of the time? Sure. TG members constitute the majority of the regulars on the server. We have several regulars who dont wear the tags who are on just as much, but the sheer percentage of people who have opted to put the tag on is much larger. Larger percentage equals larger chance. Basic mathematics. Do we hog them intentionally or EVER say to people "non-TG tagged people cant have such and such asset"? ABSOLUTELY NOT. So while the math points to a greater statistical probability of TG tag wearing people having use of the assets, scapegoating people wearing the tag as the OP did is wrong and I'm sick of seeing it.

It's the same thing with saying that people in IHS are "elitist". Sure, there are going to be some that are. But you know what, they might have a right to be, if only just a little. Some of the IHS dont have an "apply and join" policy. Some of them are really very hard to get into and the selection criteria are very strict. Should people be allowed to pat themselves on the back and hold the people they play with to a higher standard? You're damn right they should. I expect a higher standard from anyone who joins my squad. But you know what, my squads also have a good time too. So if you'd like to call that elitism, be my guest.

So let me sum this up simply: in stark contrast to the OP's rant, perhaps the problem isnt as much about people wearing TG tags hogging assets, but people who arent using the fact that they see tagged people in assets more often as an excuse to have a rant. Call me silly, but I see the OP's actions as childish and ridiculous. You aimed at starting a fight by creating the squad. You said you did it because you were angry, so it's by your own admission that you werent motivated by anything but your own selfish intent. Thats not the way we do business here.

Let's grow the hell up kids. Seriously.