As the thread starter you shouldnt really state your own opinion alongside the question unless you want to influence the outcome but no biggie



I played this map yesterday, normally I dont love it but it was good actually. Not quite sure why but maybe my squad/team didnt suck and so it was ok.

I think the tickets are too high, Ive said elsewhere I would prefer battles to be more decisive not the 1-0 close ticket outcomes that we often see. This applies to big maps especially because the dynamics are larger and infantry dwarfed

I prefer this to kashan most of the time, the scenery is better. Saying that I just had an amazing game of kashan in the tournament so mostly its about gameplay and your teams coordination.


The challenger tanks are much better then chinese, they climb amazing and with so many hils that matters. Plus hitboxes plus the jet imbalance.
But just to be confusing I have to say I prefer asymetric gameplay as the imbalance helps to avoid stalemates.
Obviously each team needs an equal chance of winning either through ticket or some advantage

I like the two tier ticket bleed, a higher rate to each would be good also. Again to encourage imbalance and avoid stalemates

Originally Posted by w.WAREHOUSE

It would be a cool map if it didn't have the coal mine...I say fill it in with water and put some warships in PR 0.8

Sure put a boat on it but keep the flag and base just the same under the water then you must dive down to capture it This would make it primarily an infantry controlled flag to bring the two main flags into a similar position as kashan bunkers