Originally Posted by Eavy Gunner

I'd say no because Insurgency brings out the worst in everyone. And I don't think many people want to play as Insurgents due to crappy weapons. Thats my thoughts, may be wrong, but thats how I see it

My thoughts also. With this new server the admin coverage would be spread pretty thin. I have yet to find insuregency bring much teamwork. Usually you find most of the team one manning amour, or a broken up infantry squad, all doing its own thing.

I really don't think it will represent what TG stands for. Players will play it during the day (European players) and be left with the impression that TG is just like battle arena, which it will be for the most part. I'm sure you will rarely see all squads coordinating as one. It will just be very chaotic and won't encourage the same amount of teamwork that AAS has brought.

Maybe a second AAS server, but to insuregency. Please no.

Originally Posted by Catraphact

The only reason I see for that happening is when the first server is filled with 62 supporting members. The TG server has a long way to go before that happens.

The more you restrict supply, the more you "encourage" people to pay up. Few people become supporting members because they "support TG's values." Take away the reserved slot and the amount of donors will fall.

Why increase supply when there is a lot of unused capacity (because there aren't 62 supporting members on the server at one time, ever).

true, but if you are a supporting member you shouldn't be paying just for a reserve slot. You should actually want to support this community.

Although I do agree that there should be benifits for paying 8 bucks a month.

Another thought, if the second server isn't THAT popular it might make both servers stay at about 40-50/64, which migght take away from the large-scaled coordination that goes along with having a full server. Playing a 64 player map with out 64 players will make infantry scarse. Hopefully not.

Originally Posted by TheSkudDestroyer

No - INS brings in smacktards that know little about the game. Just look at BattleArena.

Good in concept, but it would polarize.

Second that entirely. Battlearena is a perfect example. Sure, we would have adims on. But, I don't want to deal with someone TKing me for an asset, or seeing 6 one man locked squads. I know the admins would be on it. But, thier not ALWAYS on, specifically during daytime play. We get disposable watching over the daytime players. Although he takes a good while to respond sometimes (no offense all the admins do a great job) and I for one would have left by this time out of frustration. The gameplay would be down the crapper. I go to battlearena to have a more relaxed style of gameplay and tend to do a armoured or a relaxed infantry squad. Relaxed as being, here is our objective, stay on me to set a rally, then we all commit suicide and spawn as engineer, then look for teh cache. Doesn't involve a lot of teamwork.

Say NO to INS