Welcome to Tactical Gamer

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
Discussion: Project Reality / PR:BF2 - allowed? - Originally Posted by commie2008 [!Reporting + Player's Name + Offense] Hmm I have never seen
  1. #16

    RELEASE_THE_KRAKEN's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    20

    Re: allowed?

    Quote Originally Posted by commie2008 View Post
    [!Reporting + Player's Name + Offense]

    Hmm I have never seen this. I assume that this goes into the console and then is seen by the server admin/dedicated server program?
    Xfire= ouchiegiver1

  2.  
  3. #17

    McGann's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,829

    Re: allowed?

    Quote Originally Posted by mat552 View Post
    Think about it this way: if it would bother you if someone on the other team set up an ambush where you are, how would you feel, honestly.
    This is probably the best way to judge it. If you get ambushed and you think.."Wow, I should have been paying better attention" then most likely it was a good ambush. If you get ambushed and you think "WTF? why would they put up an ambush there?"... then it most likey is NOT a good place.

    Good rule of thumb:
    "Only go close to the enemy main once you cap all the other flags".
    What's weird about a young goats head, smoking a joint, tied with a scarf to a mobile artillery gun? - Jeepo


    Killing threads since 2007


  4.  
  5. #18

    McGann's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,829

    Re: allowed?

    Quote Originally Posted by RELEASE_THE_KRAKEN View Post
    Hmm I have never seen this. I assume that this goes into the console and then is seen by the server admin/dedicated server program?
    it gets the admins attention.
    What's weird about a young goats head, smoking a joint, tied with a scarf to a mobile artillery gun? - Jeepo


    Killing threads since 2007


  6.  

     
  7. #19

    Berlancic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia, Brisbane - best city in Oz.
    Age
    16
    Posts
    1,406

    Re: allowed?

    Well I guess the best way to do it may be not to do it at all.
    |TG-69th|Berlancic2
    "Speed. Aggression. Surprise."



  8.  
  9. #20


    Delta*RandyShugart*'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Good ol Suburbia in Southern Westchester County NY
    Posts
    6,091
    Blog Entries
    49

    Re: allowed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Berlancic View Post
    Well I guess the best way to do it may be not to do it at all.
    That's what she said.
    Randy = Ace ! - Warlab






    Randy/Bob/Magnum
    RSS Feeds:Bamboo | |TG-31st| LR IHS Info | 9/11 - Never Forget |
    Apophis - "TG was created to cater to a VERY specific type of gamer rather than trying to appeal to the greater gaming population.
    Tactical Gamer is not mainstream.
    We are not trying to attract mainstream gamers."


  10.  
  11. #21

    Sabre_Tooth_Tigger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    eurasia
    Posts
    3,588
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: allowed?

    Quote Originally Posted by ForGlory&Pain View Post
    On most insurgency maps, out of bounds limits will prevent c4 camping from coming too close.

    Except basra, you can lay mines right outside the gate afaik. Havent tried recently, actually they dont even get mines now so that must have been last version


    In answer to OP I'd say no thats too close, 200m further on seems reasonable.

    The best argument vs that is on fools road we are specifically allowed to camp the only road from the uk base but apparently the map designer wanted it this way.

    On every other map in pr a bridge will have an alternative indestructible path but on fools road this is not really the case


    Qwai is worse for chinese anyway in ucb camping. The rule is supposed to be if you cant cap dont shoot people at their own main flag even if your going to die, a hard rule to follow I guess


    With the reporting thing I think its best to type in the problem over chat before involving admin. Just my opinion but I think its a bit easy to jump the gun when a brief conversation would suffice especially amongst regulars who are willing to play by the rules anyway


    If you find yourself in a fair fight, then you have obviously failed to plan properly.

  12.  

     
  13. #22

    Sonic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Age
    18
    Posts
    1,723

    Re: allowed?

    Please don't say

    "Admin! Ban (Insert Name Here) he is one manning a tank"

    as it's not against the rules and people will laugh at you.

    I've found the best way to get an admin is to get on TS and discuss the problem. This way they can't ignore you and it's harder to get pissed at someone when you're talking to them, I find.

    But, don't join Team Coord 1 and ramble on about how some dude took your chopper.

  14.  
  15. #23

    sirsolo's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    721

    Re: allowed?

    Q: Why is this still open?
    C: !Reporting <Name> (Bunny hopping, attacking uncap) is the most common, I find.

    ~Sirsolo
    |TG-Irr|Sirsolo since 18OCT08.

    Carpe Diem


  16.  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


  
 

Back to top