Welcome to Tactical Gamer

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33
Discussion: Project Reality / PR:BF2 - Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents - Hello fellow TacticalGamers! The right for insurgents to attack coalition main bases existed because the
  1. #1

    sniggedi's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Age
    22
    Posts
    46

    Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    Hello fellow TacticalGamers!

    The right for insurgents to attack coalition main bases existed because the insurgents were sort of under-powered compared to a regular armed force. They had bad weapons, a minimum amount of medical supplies and no advanced vehicles (e.g. flying/armored).

    Now, in .85, the Insurgents got buffed and there are new "insurgent" factions: the Taliban. But theres a huge difference between those dudes and the old Insurgents faction. They can/have:
    - regular armed combat medics
    - set rally points
    - request kits

    Why should the Taliban be allowed to attack hostile uncapturable bases? There really is no reason.

    This thread is primarily about the Taliban's, not about the Insurgents' right to baserape.
    |TG|muttonchops

  2.  
  3. #2

    aus-trooper's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Australia, Melbourne
    Posts
    79

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    Gday sniggedi,

    i think the reason why insurgents can attack UCB is because; insurgents generally do not adhere to rules of combat/war, whereas regular armies do.

    Thats my take.............
    |TG-Irr| Aus-trooper

  4.  
  5. #3

    Sabre_Tooth_Tigger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    eurasia
    Posts
    3,588
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    Because the taliban do attack allied bases with rpg and mortars and basically act like terrorists would

    All the forces are localised except maybe aircraft/jdam ability of the allies


    Its not an overpowering tactic


    If you find yourself in a fair fight, then you have obviously failed to plan properly.

  6.  

     
  7. #4


    d1sp0sabl3H3r0's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Suburban Chicago
    Age
    46
    Posts
    5,491

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    Realism.

    We haven't discussed changing the rules yet and to be honest I don't see it coming up any time soon. Insurgency is very, very hard for the BluFor team. They need to defend their main base and it requires a of teamwork, but they can be successful.

    It also seems pretty clear that it is the developer's intent to allow this type of behavior, otherwise you wouldn't be able to walk right up to the exits on the US main on Fallujah nor Karbala.

    Mainly though it is realism. We try to mimic real life ROE on insurgency for both sides. US cannot fire into mosques, no matter what, and insurgency has no rules.

  8.  
  9. #5

    sniggedi's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Age
    22
    Posts
    46

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    Yeah, I understand the realism part but I talked heard a handful of people complaining about the rule even before I did.

    PR is still a game and even the devs know that, so there are still some points where gameplay is higher rated than realism.
    |TG|muttonchops

  10.  
  11. #6

    w.WAREHOUSE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,167

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    I think the map makers failed to consider this topic, however, making it very easy to drive right into most bases or fire over very low walls/fences. I would like to see the dome-of-death extended on several of the maps to at least "simulate" the idea that most bases have 24/7 static defenders watching the base at all times. We "should" have defenders watching our main bases...but everyone knows that most of the time we don't have many players willing to spend an entire round babysitting. Sure would be cool if we could get AI "bots" to mount stationary weapons in the mains to fire on incoming insurgents. I think a UAV flying over the main would be a cool & helpful addition, although I don't know if this is used.
    |TG-X|WAREHOUSE

  12.  

     
  13. #7

    ForGlory&Pain's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,009

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    I dislike the idea of RPG's shooting right into the main base proper from a mosque tower and not being able to return fire. Camping the exits with IEDs is one thing, but at least you can defend that. I would like to see it permitted for snipers to engage actively hostile targets in the mosque tower, becuase honestly if a SAM or RPG was firing out of the top and risking a multimillion dollar BH or Cobra, an accurate sniper round would probably be used, even if by local military forces. Indiscriminate or HE rounds are a different matter.

  14.  
  15. #8

    sniggedi's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Age
    22
    Posts
    46

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    Quote Originally Posted by w.WAREHOUSE View Post
    I think a UAV flying over the main would be a cool & helpful addition, although I don't know if this is used.
    That is indeed a pretty good idea.
    |TG|muttonchops

  16.  
  17. #9

    WaterIsPoison's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    201

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    Quote Originally Posted by ForGlory&Pain View Post
    I dislike the idea of RPG's shooting right into the main base proper from a mosque tower and not being able to return fire.
    As far as I know, the only map where this is possible is Fallujah. However, the tall tower is technically NOT a mosque (i.e not a permanent spawn) and more of a palace. The Americans CAN engage targets there.



  18.  

     
  19. #10

    Spitfire14's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    390

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    They mortar and rocket US bases constantly in real life.

  20.  
  21. #11

    Pistolfied's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    939

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    Baserape is fine IMO, it's a real life tactic for insurgents and the taliban, if you are growing tired of it take some initiative and squad lead a base defence squad.

    Damnit Blizzard, fix ZvT already >.<
    In Soviet Russian, Arma admins are nice to you!

  22.  
  23. #12

    sniggedi's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Age
    22
    Posts
    46

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    Quote Originally Posted by Spitfire14 View Post
    They mortar and rocket US bases constantly in real life.
    So would regular armies. Supply depots and command posts are important targets.

    I think the realism part is no argument in this discussion since if we want to have realism, there shouldn't be a no baserape rule at all.
    |TG|muttonchops

  24.  

     
  25. #13


    johnflenaly's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,658

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    I don't really care either way, but like muttonchops said the realism argument has no weight, Real life armies make bases a priorty target.

  26.  
  27. #14


    Namebot's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,944

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    The problem I see with base raping now is that the assets cost tickets, yet the teams have no control over when they spawn in. You cannot delay their spawn until you have secured you base. If you base is under full siege by rpgs and mortars wouldn't you delay the delivery of new equipment until you could secure the area?
    |TG-12th| Namebot


  28.  
  29. #15


    d1sp0sabl3H3r0's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Suburban Chicago
    Age
    46
    Posts
    5,491

    Re: Insurgency Baserape Rule - or Taliban =/= Insurgents

    Quote Originally Posted by Namebot View Post
    The problem I see with base raping now is that the assets cost tickets, yet the teams have no control over when they spawn in. You cannot delay their spawn until you have secured you base. If you base is under full siege by rpgs and mortars wouldn't you delay the delivery of new equipment until you could secure the area?
    This is true, but since mortars are on a 30 minute timer, you can pretty much gauge when an attack is coming.

    More importantly, you simply cannot control what happens to an asset once they are in control of players on your own team.

    Yesterday on Archer, we had a pilot try to fly a huey under a hanger, resulting in 15 tickets lost instantaneously when the huey crashed into a jeep parked under the hanger. Shortly afterward, a humvee with troops in it was returning to base, hit the hesco barrier and the collision mesh of the barbed wire - dead humvee.

    We lost more tickets to our own players than the Taliban inflicted on us by baserape. Actually, we defended the main for the first 30 minutes or more of the round, easily repulsed their first attempt at baserape and I think that was their only attempt. So, it can be done. It just takes some players who are willing to sacrifice their "fun" for the good of the team.

    The rule isn't going to change in the near future, so I think it is up to players to adapt and overcome. A large part of this is that the assets do cost tickets, but instead of trying to protect those assets with tactics, the players seem to want the admins to do it for them.

  30.  

     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


  
 

Back to top