I think that there is much that can be disputed here. But to keep it short, my preferences run toward games that offer a combination of:

1. "Simulation and Realism" in so far as all aspects are correctly modeled insofar as it is possible. Once that is established, then call it "reality". This is an all or none option here, gentlemen. It's either correctly labeled "arcady" or its "realism", not something somewhere in between with biased, preferential treatment leaning to one particular side or toward one school of thought. With respect to Sam Hoy's comments, and I don't mean to pick on him, but rather the prevailing attitude that PR offers, "As real as it gets scenarios," is simply false in just about every way, with the exception of simulated infantry-on-infantry only combat, which is done quite well in that respect. Everything else, however, appears skewed heavily in favor of this one model and is not representative of "reality" in the least degree. Vehicle modeling with respect to vs. Infantry confrontations and other scenarios is where the model begins to fall apart, IMHO. It seems as though people draw the line at where they want reality to begin and end in combat simulations but are still willing to slap a label of "realistic" on the whole thing when the dust settles at the end of the day. I feel that this needs to be disputed. It's just not "reality" if realism extends only as far as the foot soldier’s iron sights.
2. Teamwork where everyone contributes toward a common goal with no consideration given toward individual performance above that of the group. Even the most skilled player will never achieve his highest potential if the team he plays with/for will not support him to those heights. The man with the most touchdowns won't hold the records he does if his blockers aren't doing their jobs. Teams like the 1st MIP have been a real treat to play with as they appear to have this level of teamplay worked out down to a science.
3. A mature atmosphere above all, although the odd teabagging here and there to lighten spirits now and then certainly helps as well. Give me a casual environment with all of the above and I'm as happy as a pig in mud.

I do not disagree with what PR is trying to accomplish in principle. But there are aspects of it that tend to lead me to believe that its current appellation is not suitable given how it is currently played.