Welcome to Tactical Gamer

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 67
Discussion: Project Reality / PR:BF2 - Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32 - Will start playing it soon then, and is Hills of Hamjong still in the rotation?
  1. #16

    Steevo's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Emmeloord, The Netherlands
    Age
    24
    Posts
    219

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    Will start playing it soon then, and is Hills of Hamjong still in the rotation?
    I wish it whould not be becouse the map is extremely one sided, i have never seen the US go past the first few bunkers.

  2.  
  3. #17

    Ghost Dog's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,851

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    Quote Originally Posted by Steevo View Post
    Will start playing it soon then, and is Hills of Hamjong still in the rotation?
    I wish it whould not be becouse the map is extremely one sided, i have never seen the US go past the first few bunkers.
    Agreed, the bleed is too high, it 's usually over in 30min.

  4.  
  5. #18

    geogob's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Quebec City, Canada
    Age
    32
    Posts
    105

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    Nice! Thank you! Can't wait to try it out. I'll hope for it tonight.

  6.  

     
  7. #19

    msdz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    WV
    Age
    39
    Posts
    1,206

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    Hills of Hamjong or whatever is a good map, bleed is to high on it though. If the side attacking the hill can get organized with a good CO giving orders then it can be won and have seen it ONCE. Thing I noticed is what really helps out is having ALL the snipers and marksman sitting back picking off the enemy on the hill making sure to cover the advancing squads. Since there IS only 2 snipers and 2 marksman then they not only have to worry about their own squad they are in but ALL who are advancing. All soldiers should advance at once also to ease the snipers coverage on them and make it a little harder on the enemy trying to poke their heads out and keep from getting sniped and straight up the hill is usually good as well so snipers can still keep an eye on the soldiers, also enemy does need to poke head over to see if you are advancing giving the snipers their shots they need.

    Now Kashan 64 and Kashan 32, I have yet to play the 32 player version. Will try it laterand see how it goes. I think Kashan 64 would be better without the jets sometimes cause they really are useless except for the tankbusters and sometimes all the pilots like to do anyway is just fly around and not even attempt to kill any tanks. I have on numerous occassions just been a spotter for enemy armor and tried to get the tankbusters to do their jobs but they just fly over and never worry about the tank you just spotted out for them. So if 32 player does not have the jets it would not sadden me to much, I don;t fly on that mao either cause that is usually the only map I lag on and the last time I flew was a BH that was full and lagged out and killed my whole squad, so I fly no more.

  8.  
  9. #20

    fuzzhead's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Windsor, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,028

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    32 is exactly the same as 64 but without the jets.

    32 plays MUCH MUCH Better IMO

  10.  
  11. #21

    Dirtboy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Age
    28
    Posts
    3,867

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    The only problem I see with having the 32 Player version is all the Chopper whores, its worst than jets IMO!

  12.  

     
  13. #22

    Steevo's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Emmeloord, The Netherlands
    Age
    24
    Posts
    219

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    Hello chopper whore, meet mister AA Riflemen

  14.  
  15. #23

    geogob's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Quebec City, Canada
    Age
    32
    Posts
    105

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    Yeah, well... at least AA can do something about choppers!

  16.  
  17. #24

    geogob's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Quebec City, Canada
    Age
    32
    Posts
    105

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    16 ppl waiting for the jets. Hoorray. Lost game.

  18.  

     
  19. #25

    Belhade's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York (no, not the city)
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,512

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    Did anyone explain to them that the jets weren't in that version of the map?
    |TG-6th|Belhade
    "I am actually looking forward to watching Jon and Kate plus 8." - Dirtboy





  20.  
  21. #26

    geogob's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Quebec City, Canada
    Age
    32
    Posts
    105

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    We sure did! But again... more than 2 full squads waiting for the 2 jets? WTH?

  22.  
  23. #27

    BigGaayAl's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    gent, belgium
    Posts
    2,684
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    Played co on this for the first time. It was good fun, but a-one problem appeared. At one point our whole team was pinned by one tank.... NO-ONE on our team had AT, and worse, I got reports for minutes, that the HAT was taken...

    Perhaps one or two were stolen I don't know. But it was a bit too much rapage, especially since we had a well organized team. We should have had access to the HAT, regardless of it being stolen. This is a real problem in the 32 version I fear. It may become like Kuffrah too much, where one tank can own the whole opposing team. I like Kuffrah, but I don't want another map like that.

    Other then that I think it was great to play the map in a different way. I asked SL's why they thought we were winning by 200 points, apparently because teh others were at the runway :/.
    What it's like to play online games as a grown-up:http://s3.amazonaws.com/theoatmeal-i...e_gaming/1.jpg

    "Heroism on command, senseless violence, and all the loathsome nonsense that goes by the name of patriotism -how passionately I hate them!"
    "Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind."
    (Einstein, both)

    ***I will be in India 14 dec till end of januari***

  24.  

     
  25. #28

    geogob's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Quebec City, Canada
    Age
    32
    Posts
    105

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    That kit stealing thing needs to be fixed. First, it makes no sense to penalize a team for having its kit stolen. Second, it really breaks the game.

    From what I saw, the gunships are not used very intelligently either. They should focus on destroying armor from a distance. Not flying around in circles over the bunkers, shooting infantry. That's not their primary role.

  26.  
  27. #29

    Asiafyed's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    16

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    I agree that the kit stealing thing can get out of hand, but sometimes stealing a kit is just what you need. I remember playing as an insurgent in whatever the map was, I had just killed a USMC officer, stole his kit, and did some pretty good damage to enemy infantry. hahaha then again, maybe its only a good thing with insurgents?

    ...maybe all regular army weapons should be fitted with an anti-theft feature...steal gun, gun goes boom lol hahaha
    i kid i kid

  28.  
  29. #30

    Sabre_Tooth_Tigger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    eurasia
    Posts
    3,588
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Suggestion: replace Kashan 64 by kashan 32

    Maybe they could extend it. Steal their kit and get the use of the vehicle too.
    Seems like one of the few HAT downsides to me and all the more reason for one guy not to be working by himself


    If you find yourself in a fair fight, then you have obviously failed to plan properly.

  30.  

     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


  
 

Back to top