If you are still harboring openings (or perhaps at a later date) I would be interested.
I have in my personal collection the PHB, DMG, MM, MMII, forgotten realms, enemies and allies, as well as a couple of d20 MM's from other sources. 3.0, not 3.5 tho.
I would also be willing to play on a fill-in basis if you have issues getting everybody together for every adventure (I can think of atleast one suitable backstory that would work in such an instance, and could be discussed over PM's etc.)
limited experience DM'ing (used to run a small group of friends back in HS, but we mostly just screwed around alot ;D) Haven't actually sat down and played since well before that, and most of my "recent" experience was in text-based. (IRC ftw)
Currently unemployed, so availability is a non-issue at this point, fully intend to be regularily employed over the summer at some point.

And my take on the Alignment argument: Make your character, work out his backstory and figure out how you'd want to play him. Stick him in a couple classic situtions and figure out how he'd act. Based on that info, choose the alignment that fits closest. Therefor allowing yourself to play your alignment. Most "Stab PC's in the back" tend to use the argument "But I'm chatotic evil!" Which is really just the alignment playing their character instead of the character playing the alignment. It also helps to not think of alignments as black or white, which is sort of how they're portrayed. Of course, that may make no sense at all, but hey I actualy prefer to play "evil" characters, because I have a very dark and dry sense of humor, and it tends to fit much better. It also opens all sorts of interesting character interaction that you wouldn't normally get with a wholly "good" party. RP XP!