Go Back   Tactical Gamer > General Forums > The Sandbox


The Sandbox This forum is for current events, satire and humorous discussions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-09-2008, 06:07 PM   #31 (permalink)
leejo
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Age: 39
Posts: 7,411
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Other issues in this thread aside, I think folks should consider 3 points:

1. The national debt isn't the issue. The national debt as a % of GDP is the issue
2. Without getting into the nitty gritty of the lag between cause and effect, to a certain extend blaming or praising any president for the % of national debt vs. GDP is sorta like blaming the fireman for the fire. Reagan wasn't elected to trash a economy that was running on all cylinders, he was elected because the economy was a disaster. Anyone who understand how balance sheets, the PnL, and cash flows relate shouldn't be surprised to see the debt ratchet up as government invested in revving up the economy while not simultaneously burdening it with new taxes.
3. Consider what the national debt really means. It's not as if some day the government will announce that the debt is due. In many ways it's like a credit card you use for business expenses instead of one you use to pay for a big tv. When you think of it this way, it's not so much the size of the debt that matters, it's your cash flow.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt
leejo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2008, 08:02 PM   #32 (permalink)
ScratchMonkey
 
ScratchMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Pablo, California
Posts: 3,367
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Also note that the deficit is not the debt. Some confuse the two, and those who love to spend love to take advantage of that confusion.
__________________
Sig
ScratchMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 04-09-2008, 08:18 PM   #33 (permalink)
xTYBALTx
 
xTYBALTx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,650
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Magna is correct.
__________________
Current Tybalt theme song: Mason v. Princess - Perfect

"$250,000 a year won't get me to Central Park West."

Last edited by xTYBALTx; 04-09-2008 at 08:55 PM.
xTYBALTx is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2008, 08:25 PM   #34 (permalink)
MagnaCentipede

 
MagnaCentipede's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,555
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

You're not posting in the thread you think you're posting in, Tybby.
__________________
MagnaCentipede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2008, 08:41 PM   #35 (permalink)
Fenian420
 
Fenian420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 772
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Yea I was wondering what he meant by that too..

Best and quickest way in reality IMO to get economy to start back up would be legalizing cannabis, Im not trying to cause any discussion or nothing.. But foreigners would flock to the US for that as if it were Amsterdam, taxes would go down slightly (after awhile of course) because of all the stoners, potheads and even casual smokers in America and the only bad thing I can really think about that is inflating food prices
Fenian420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2008, 09:48 PM   #36 (permalink)
Rincewind
 
Rincewind's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Casting useless spells in Oklahoma.
Age: 27
Posts: 2,662
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenian420 View Post
Best and quickest way in reality IMO to get economy to start back up would be legalizing cannabis
FACE ---> PALM
__________________
~~ Veritas simplex oratio est ~~
No matter how far a wizard goes, he will always come back for his hat. --T. Pratchett

<---- You know you're getting old when you rely on your forum meta-data to remind you how old you are.

Required Reading for all TG sandboxers
Rincewind is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 04-09-2008, 10:15 PM   #37 (permalink)
leejo
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Age: 39
Posts: 7,411
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rincewind View Post
FACE ---> PALM
Why face smack? That's not such a nutty idea dude. There's been some pretty interesting scholarly discussion on exactly this point. It's called "The Funyons Effect". The way it works is you look for the person who will benefit. And you will, uh, you know, you'll, uh, you know what I'm trying to say--
leejo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2008, 10:22 PM   #38 (permalink)
Rincewind
 
Rincewind's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Casting useless spells in Oklahoma.
Age: 27
Posts: 2,662
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Quote:
Originally Posted by leejo View Post
Why face smack? That's not such a nutty idea dude. There's been some pretty interesting scholarly discussion on exactly this point. It's called "The Funyons Effect". The way it works is you look for the person who will benefit. And you will, uh, you know, you'll, uh, you know what I'm trying to say--
He said the best way to get the economy to start back up is to legalize a drug that makes you want to lay around all day and make things*. No one is gonna want to work, much less care about the economy.

In reality though, that's not why I face palmed....





*Bongs
__________________
~~ Veritas simplex oratio est ~~
No matter how far a wizard goes, he will always come back for his hat. --T. Pratchett

<---- You know you're getting old when you rely on your forum meta-data to remind you how old you are.

Required Reading for all TG sandboxers
Rincewind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 04:08 AM   #39 (permalink)
Fenian420
 
Fenian420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 772
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Haha hella funny point, what do bongs gotta do with it?
Fenian420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 07:05 AM   #40 (permalink)
Chewy

 
Chewy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oak Creek, WI
Age: 24
Posts: 1,560
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnaCentipede View Post
For one, historic figures, such as the one Our Good Friend Trudeau presents, are a straw man. Inflation, kids.

Bush in 2004 in 2004's dollars: 596 Gigglebucks.
Reagan in 1984 in 1984's dollars: 252 Gigglebucks.
Bush in 2004 in 1984's dollars: 328 Gigglebucks.
And that's just the beginning... I love when people try to blame the Republicans, solely mind you, for the debt of this country. They take nothing else into account (in Bush's case 9/11 and a revolutionized change in national security and Reagans multiple wars) for maybe why this rises.

Magna brings up some good points with the inflation, which is higher levels right now than when Clinton was in office. Add in the fact that Congress is just as much to blame for the budget (if not more so) than the President and then the graph is basically boiling down to another "Bush sucks" ad, when in fact it's hiding some real truths.

Unfortunately, the Republicans will forever be known to lower taxes (what people want) and in turn magically increase the national debt all by their lonesome. And the Democrats will be forever known to be liberal a-holes who refuse to let people speak their minds (religion and press) and carry guns.

Politics are annoying because when it comes down to it, I would hope they want some of the basic things that are good for the people, but unfortunately that doesn't always seem to be the case. Bush had his moments, but by no means was he faultless while in office. I'm not a homer for the Republicans but with the Democrats acting like children over this race, it's a bigger turn off than the war or the national debt. The national debt will always be there to some degree.

On to bigger and better things... GAS PRICES. If Obama wins and fixes that, I'll consider standing in his corner. I don't believe anyone will fix those right now... unless Congress decides our draining wallets outweighs steroids in baseball.
Chewy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 04-10-2008, 07:40 AM   #41 (permalink)
Guardianx11x
 
Guardianx11x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Midwest/DC metro
Age: 23
Posts: 869
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elwenil View Post
On the thought of taxes, since these two issues are so closely related, I support a flat tax. I don't give a damn about if you make $12k a year or $12 million, we should all pay the same percentage of your income in taxes. That's the only fair thing to do and would certainly balance out a lot of the widening gaps between the lower, middle and upper financial classes. We pay the same percentage in sales tax, why should we not pay the same percentage in income taxes?
NOBODY TOUCHED ON THIS BIT OF GENIUS?!?!

Interesting idea...perhaps I'm missing something...

In a flat tax we would have to:
-Tax the rich less...
-Tax the poor more...

This lessens the gap how?
__________________
2142: |TG-3d|Guardianx11x
CoD4: |TG-3rd|Zodiac

Guardianx11x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 09:58 AM   #42 (permalink)
sordavie
 
sordavie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 27
Posts: 1,722
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guardianx11x View Post
NOBODY TOUCHED ON THIS BIT OF GENIUS?!?!

Interesting idea...perhaps I'm missing something...

In a flat tax we would have to:
-Tax the rich less...
-Tax the poor more...

This lessens the gap how?
Or you could tax the rich the same and tax the poor a lot more.
__________________


sordavie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 10:11 AM   #43 (permalink)
leejo
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Age: 39
Posts: 7,411
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Who cares about "the gap"? Why is this important to some of you?

If everyone in this country is fed, clothed, and housed, and suddenly Bill Gates makes $2B, OMG ze gap boss, ze gap!? It seems to me that the gap is just class warfare and jealousy. If we need to work to keep the poor from starving (as opposed to dying of morbid obesity) that's one thing, but if the biggest gripe is that we're fine but they're super rich and I want some of that money too...

I just don't understand why "the gap" is a bad thing all by itself.
leejo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 11:08 AM   #44 (permalink)
Rincewind
 
Rincewind's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Casting useless spells in Oklahoma.
Age: 27
Posts: 2,662
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guardianx11x View Post
NOBODY TOUCHED ON THIS BIT OF GENIUS?!?!

Interesting idea...perhaps I'm missing something...

In a flat tax we would have to:
-Tax the rich less...
-Tax the poor more...

This lessens the gap how?
I'd actually like to see a flat federal income tax. I think it would be great!


0.0%
__________________
~~ Veritas simplex oratio est ~~
No matter how far a wizard goes, he will always come back for his hat. --T. Pratchett

<---- You know you're getting old when you rely on your forum meta-data to remind you how old you are.

Required Reading for all TG sandboxers
Rincewind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 12:09 PM   #45 (permalink)
Drizzid
 
Drizzid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Glendale, AZ
Age: 37
Posts: 2,858
Re: Fiscal Responsibility

Quote:
Best and quickest way in reality IMO to get economy to start back up would be
I am no economics expert and I have nothing concrete to back any of this up so these are just my opinions on why the economy is the way it is:

1) The USA's economy is now a service based economy. Look at any business these days and all you see is a business that provides a service. Now that the proverbial bubble has burst and people can't afford all these services, people are tightening their budget and spending less. So now these service based businesses are laying people off and those people have less money to spend and the chain reaction continues on and on. So my answer is that the USA needs to return to what made it the worlds number one super power in the world. We must return to be an industrialized nation. We need to manufacture our own goods again.

2) The war, ever heard the phrase "War is good for the economy"? That was the case in WWII. When the war effort needed more tanks, ammo or anything else what made that happen? Industrial businesses, they hired women and anyone else they could find to manufacture those tanks, ammo ect ect. People made more money so they spent more money so everyone made more money including the poor, middle class and the rich. In todays world if we need more tanks where do we get them from? France? Israel? I am not sure but it's not from here I can tell you that!! What about circuit boards and for all the electronics that goes into todays military tools? Where does all that come from? China? Korea? I don't know but it's not from here. So not only is the war putting a financial burden on the USA, it is making other countries richer and richer.

I can go on and on and I maybe completely wrong as I have no basis for my OPINION. You want a strong economy? Then return to the days of where we made our own goods instead of paying every other country besides our own. Blast away fellas
__________________


TG-Drizzid
Yifios
Phoenix (87:55)
Marble
colony
Danetia
Menzo (86:55)
Wine
ColonyII
Rayiatia
Paradise (87:54)
Sulfur
Drizzid is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
debt, deficit, fail, responsibility, united states


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
©2004-2008 - Tactical Gamer - All Rights Reserved