Go Back   Tactical Gamer > General Forums > The Sandbox


The Sandbox This forum is for current events, satire and humorous discussions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-27-2008, 02:03 AM   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 103
Re: The outing of Syria or crying wolf

Quote:
Originally Posted by War.mongeR1 View Post
How come when GW does something unilaterally, he has heck to pay from the media, but when Billy did it, it was all cool?
Politics are just like sports. Everyone has a favorite team. When the team you root for wins its great. When the team you hate wins (even when it is not against your team) it sucks.
lawndartleo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 12:02 AM   #17 (permalink)
 
Switchcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York, NY
Age: 31
Posts: 1,096
Re: The outing of Syria or crying wolf

Quote:
Originally Posted by marstein View Post
Just a spelling interjection here. FLAK is Flugabwehrkanone = Flight Defense Canon. Not flack. The military has their own abbreviation language and flak is a german one. Just Fyi.
Eh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merriam-Webster
Main Entry: flak
Variant(s): also flack \ˈflak\
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural flak also flack
Etymology: German, from Fliegerabwehrkanonen, from Flieger flyer + Abwehr defense + Kanonen cannons
Date: 1938
1: antiaircraft guns
2: the bursting shells fired from flak
3 also flack : criticism, opposition
Switchcraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 04-29-2008, 11:25 PM   #18 (permalink)
 
El_Gringo_Grande's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: OKIE HOMY
Age: 40
Posts: 2,862
Re: The outing of Syria or crying wolf

Quote:
Originally Posted by Switchcraft View Post
Cowardice? I'm gonna go with genius. This way saved the most lives, the most money, avoided war, and avoided any major break in diplomatic ties. It avoided bringing a nuclear arms race to the Arab world, avoided having the rest of the Arab nations having to worry about a nuclear Syria, or about Syria, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, or Hezbollah trying to bring a nuke to Israel and having the rest of them face the consequences.

Would the Security Council or the IAEA have been able to provide a more rapid, peaceful, and diplomatic solution? Signs point to no.

Winners: America, Israel, Syria, North Korea, pretty much everybody else. Losers: Guys selling illegal nuclear weapons technolgy unlucky enough to be in that reactor, Russian arms dealers who do false advertising.
I wouldn't call it genius. I would call it understanding the world they (Israel) live in. The solution was not peaceful or diplomatic. Rapid and effective?Defiantly in the short term to achieve a short term goal. Nobody knows what the long term brings. I don't see it as lessening tensions. But that may be impossible.

To say there are winners is being very generous. I don't see any winners at all. What I see is a one more act that didn't bring on a larger war.
__________________
I’m not racists, I have republican friends. Radio show host.
- "The essence of tyranny is the denial of complexity". -Jacob Burkhardt
- "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds" - Emerson
- "People should not be afraid of it's government, government should be afraid of it's People." - Line from V for Vendetta
- If software were as unreliable as economic theory, there wouldn't be a plane made of anything other than paper that could get off the ground. Jim Fawcette
El_Gringo_Grande is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2004-2008 - Tactical Gamer - All Rights Reserved