Go Back   Tactical Gamer > General Forums > The Sandbox


The Sandbox This forum is for current events, satire and humorous discussions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-05-2006, 10:42 PM   #46 (permalink)
 
Leonidas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: District of Columbia, U.S.A
Age: 17
Posts: 493
Re: 'Proper Armamanet'

Quote:
Originally Posted by CingularDuality
It would be like playing BF2, except if you die because of lag, it would be a bit more consequential!
"I thought about joining the army. But what happens if I get lag out there? I'm dead! I hear they don't even have respawn in RL!" - FPS Doug
__________________
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling that thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety is a miserable creature, who has no chance at being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. -- John Stuart Mill--

"O xein angellein lakedaimoniois hoti tede keimetha tois keinon rhemasi peithomenoi"- Monument, Thermopylae
Leonidas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 11:27 PM   #47 (permalink)
 
SmokingTarpan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,445
Re: 'Proper Armamanet'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonidas
Why? Sigh, Americans have gotten into their own comfortable world, where it just not possible that three suburbans full of bad guys would roll up to a top security lab and fight their way inside in an attempt to steal/destroy the contents of the facility or to barricade themselves inside and set off the powder keg.
I'm not saying that it's not possible, I'm saying that the chances of such a thing happening outside of a Red Dawn situation are beyond slim. And, frankly, if Red Dawn were to happen, something is rather wrong with our security, and miniguns aren't going to help that.

If we need such an overt show of force to deter terrorists, why not just park some tanks and APC's out front? Bigger is better seems to be the theme. Unless, of course, that seems like overkill to you. :P

Personally I think that, short of full-scale war erupting in the continental US, we've seen the last of the overt terrorist acts over here for a while. Overt here being something we have an opportunity to deal with before the fact, however time miniscule to react. I'd rather see tax dollars being spent on a legal way to find and intercept terrorists before they show up in their SUV's to launch an assault on a complex.
__________________

[squadl]
"I am the prettiest african-american, vietnamese..cong..person." -SugarNCamo
SmokingTarpan is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 02-05-2006, 11:37 PM   #48 (permalink)


 
CingularDuality's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth area of Texas, USA
Age: 33
Posts: 16,638
Re: 'Proper Armamanet'

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingTarpan
Personally I think that, short of full-scale war erupting in the continental US, we've seen the last of the overt terrorist acts over here for a while.
So you don't think it's possible for planes to be hijacked and flown into important buildings again right now? I think you're wrong. I think that we, at all levels within our country, have already become complacent.

Which reminds me... It's time to bump a thread.
CingularDuality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 11:45 PM   #49 (permalink)
 
SmokingTarpan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,445
Re: 'Proper Armamanet'

Quote:
Originally Posted by CingularDuality
So you don't think it's possible for planes to be hijacked and flown into important buildings again right now?
Absolutely not (at least in America), for two reasons. One: it's been done, and terrorists are moving on to other tactics that aren't being guarded against so closely. Two: I don't believe there's an American alive right now that wouldn't rush a terrorist attempting to hijack a plane.
__________________

[squadl]
"I am the prettiest african-american, vietnamese..cong..person." -SugarNCamo
SmokingTarpan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 12:33 AM   #50 (permalink)
 
Leonidas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: District of Columbia, U.S.A
Age: 17
Posts: 493
Re: 'Proper Armamanet'

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingTarpan
Absolutely not (at least in America), for two reasons. One: it's been done, and terrorists are moving on to other tactics that aren't being guarded against so closely. Two: I don't believe there's an American alive right now that wouldn't rush a terrorist attempting to hijack a plane.
1. Maybe, but that advantage will disappear if you get complacent and lower security.

2. Now this part is true. The hijackings of old, where the people on the plane would be retuned mostly intact if damands were met are gone, it seems. The only kind of hijackings you get now are the kind where the plane is used as a weapon, so every passenger and pilot will fully believe that they will die if the terrorists take over the plane.

Also, it has become public knowledge that it is almost totally impossible to get a bomb on a plane, so that ruse will no longer work. It is also almost totally impossible to get a gun on board, so that significantly emboldens and empowers the passengers/pilots.

See my above argument for my stance on the subject at hand. I still fully stand by it.
__________________
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling that thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety is a miserable creature, who has no chance at being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. -- John Stuart Mill--

"O xein angellein lakedaimoniois hoti tede keimetha tois keinon rhemasi peithomenoi"- Monument, Thermopylae
Leonidas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 12:50 AM   #51 (permalink)
 
Steeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Age: 30
Posts: 2,923
Re: 'Proper Armamanet'

How many hijackings of either kind have there actually been?
__________________
Steeler is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 02-06-2006, 01:13 AM   #52 (permalink)
 
SmokingTarpan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,445
Re: 'Proper Armamanet'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonidas
1. Maybe, but that advantage will disappear if you get complacent and lower security.
I'm not saying lower security. Frankly, I think airlines are about as secure as they're going to get, short of putting an officer with a minigun in the middle of the isle. What I am saying is that the terrorists know we're mostly watching and fortifying the front wall of our castle, which leaves the others more vulnerable. Why attack in a fashion that will be expected? Thus my problem with the miniguns; so worried about an all-out army style assault that we are, it makes me wonder what we're forgetting. That is what the enemy will use against us.

As I said before, I'm not worried about an army popping out of thin air, I'm worried about a lone bad guy making it past security.
__________________

[squadl]
"I am the prettiest african-american, vietnamese..cong..person." -SugarNCamo
SmokingTarpan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 01:16 AM   #53 (permalink)


 
CingularDuality's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth area of Texas, USA
Age: 33
Posts: 16,638
Re: 'Proper Armamanet'

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingTarpan
Two: I don't believe there's an American alive right now that wouldn't rush a terrorist attempting to hijack a plane.
Oh, I can think of plenty that would try to reconcile their differences with the terrorists....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonidas
Also, it has become public knowledge that it is almost totally impossible to get a bomb on a plane, so that ruse will no longer work. It is also almost totally impossible to get a gun on board, so that significantly emboldens and empowers the passengers/pilots.
I certainly hope that all the terrorists believe you...
CingularDuality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2006, 10:02 AM   #54 (permalink)
 
ScratchMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Pablo, California
Posts: 3,903
Re: 'Proper Armamanet'

Quote:
Originally Posted by CingularDuality
Except that .mil HMMWVs suck...

You'd be better served (and more comfortable) in a few of THESE.
Sucks that they passworded access to the rest of the site. They should have used the Coral Cache to handle the load.
__________________
Sig
ScratchMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TG's Proper Way to Play Civ4 Yer Mom Civilization IV - Strategy & Planning 5 12-23-2005 11:29 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2004-2008 - Tactical Gamer - All Rights Reserved