Switch

Whatever the person who uploaded it onto you tube added onto the end is irrelevant. The body of the link is a lecture with valid points. I think the person just jumped on Dan Rather (I think) admitting that it looked like the demolitions we're all familiar with. That wasn't my purpose in linking it.

As far as the lectures concerned, I'm not sure why making valid points qualifies as propaganda though.
Are you disputing anything he said? Was this somehow out of context?

Chomky uses the 'official' definition of terrorism when disputing the issue. In this lecture, he cites the definition used in a US military manual. I don't know what other perspective he has on it, as far as his personal definition is concerned. You said cropped together. Are you saying there was more to this that somehow discredited or countered my point? If you have a longer more inclusive version please link it. I'm not opposed to reviewing the whole lecture.

I'm not sure what the difference is between state sponsored terror and political assassination. In any case, 80 people died and 250 were injured in a carbombing.

I don't know much about the target as an individual. He seems to be a strong Muslim advocate. Other than that I don't know.

__________________
|TG|Switch

Better known as:
That noob who crashed the chopper.
That noob who ran over the mine.
That noob who TK'd me with a sniper rifle.
That noob who hit that APC at 300m with light AT! Our APC...