![]() |


|
|
#61 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,857
|
Re: cs_parkhouse
Well, considering that allowing the Counter-Terrorists to get on the bridge is a serious security breach, the Terrorists should ensure (perhaps by crossing it and defending) that they don't take it. Allowing the Counter-Terrorists an additional angle of attack is nothing short of tactical failure.
__________________
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. ~ Bertrand Russell I have a tendency to key out three or four things and then let them battle for supremacy while I key, so there's a lot of backspacing as potential statements are slaughtered and eaten by the victors. ~ Magna Centipede |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bremerton, WA
Age: 37
Posts: 104
|
Re: cs_parkhouse
I agree on the tactical significance of the bridge for T's. However the difficult part is to define how far is too far once the terrorist has crossed the bridge. Maybe we could say just to the other side. But going far enough where you can see and shoot someone in the picnic area by the water I would say is too far. If I am positioned in that area as a CT that should be a safe zone. A few times as I am waiting for the right opportunity to move into water I have been shot in the side of the head from a Terrorist who crossed and wandered too far.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kansas City area (U.S.A.)
Age: 37
Posts: 1,261
|
Re: cs_parkhouse
Personal opinion:
Going across covered bridge is Fine. Turning the corner a bit is fine to shoot at those coming or at roof of boathouse is semi-fine. Moving toward the boathouse after turning the corner is not fine. Q: Is going up that ladder at the corner fine? I'd say yes and I'd say no. I'd say yes because it really isn't any farther than being at the corner. But I'd say no because that then leads to the temptation to walk toward the boathouse on the rock wall.
__________________
"There's two left. So there's one and someone else." Disciple |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,129
|
Re: cs_parkhouse
No safe zones. As long as the T is using communication they should be able to take the ladder and shoot you from the higher position. This is with full teams though. If your playing 3 on 3 I don't see the reason to be by the ladder but to atleast be on the T side of it.
Again if your using comms I find that a good spot for T's and CT's. CT's because we can sit back and kill 2 plus T's and then dominate them. I will warn at the begining of Parkhouse everytime to beware of that bridge. If your not doing this then your just not being careful. You should warn on any map. This is just good intel and your team will thank you later. If T's are losing teamates left and right at the hose from a rush and then they still stay out there I believe this to be a form of killhunting unless they have the hostages in tow. Game on then. This is how I play it and will play it until our Gaming Officer says otherwise ![]()
__________________
FUN FUN |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

