Welcome to Tactical Gamer

User Tag List

Page 1 of 25 1234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 365
  1. #1
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Blog entryTagger Second Class

    Ytman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,689
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Why U No Llike Control?

    This will lose me a lot of TG e-peen but I'm gonna say it;

    Why do we take the stance of;

    "Gun Control!?!?!?! WHAT?! They can take my guns after I'm done unloading my clip."

    Why is the right to shoot toilets or soda cans in ones back yard with a 100 round AR-15 more important than the security of our society?
    "a man cannot just be; he can only be what he is by doing what he does,"
    'Virtue and the Moral Life'
    Bernard Mayo

  2.  
  3. #2
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures10000 Experience Points

    Spur's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,268
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    Why should we not have the right to defend ourselves? Countless stories of gun carriers saving lives go unpublished or published as little footnotes.

  4.  
  5. #3
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Blog entryTagger Second Class

    Ytman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,689
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    Cite five footnotes please it'll be great to hear some good brought by a fully automatic assault weapon in the civilian sector. Don't count off duty police officers though.

    Despite the allusion to anecdotal evidence Self-Defense is not my question and I'm not even saying you shouldn't be able to defend yourself.

    One interesting thing is that in Japan, where fire arm possession is illegal, how many of these terrible psychopaths resort to illegally obtained assault weapons as a weapon of choice?

    I digress, the OP says; when does control become a synonymy for ban?

    Why are cars more controlled than guns? Cars provide a function daily for all of societies inhabitants and guns provide a means to an end.
    "a man cannot just be; he can only be what he is by doing what he does,"
    'Virtue and the Moral Life'
    Bernard Mayo

  6.  

  7. #4
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures10000 Experience Points

    Spur's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,268
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    Fully auto is illegal for the average individual. How is that relevant to your stance (or mine) on gun control? I would be very skeptical of him legally owning a fully auto rifle (but I concede that it is possible).

    As far as 5 footnotes, we may be out of sync here. Guns in the hands of someone with a license or a permit have saved many lives. I personally do not know, nor have I read of anyone who uses a concealed fully automatic AR 15 for self defense. For home defense, most folks I know, or reading I have done, shotgun or pistol are better suited. AR 15 (semi auto) is better suited for varmint hunting than home or personal defense in your average neighborhood.

    Why are cars in this conversation? Why are we comparing Japanese to Americans?

  8.  
  9. #5
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entryTagger Second Class

    Harlequin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Chasing an inside straight
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,093
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    Full auto can be owned by civilians if the firearm was manufactured before 1986 and said civilian has about $15-20k + a $200 stamp from the ATF. Other NFA items like SBRs and suppressors(aka silencers) can be had by civilians provided they form a trust or have a senior LEO sign off on it and also buy a $200 stamp.

    I'm a gun advocate and I am a gun control advocate. We need more of it. It's when the word "ban" starts getting thrown around is when I start having a problem. There are people in this country right now that shouldn't own firearms that do, they are called idiots. But how to separate the idiots, (or the psychopathic murderers for that matter) from the rest who should have the right to own firearms?

    Japan? Really? You chose a country with vending machines that sell girls' used panties to compare us to?

  10.  
  11. #6
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupVeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry

    Skud's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Age
    24
    Posts
    8,333
    Blog Entries
    20
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ytman View Post
    This will lose me a lot of TG e-peen but I'm gonna say it;

    Why do we take the stance of;

    "Gun Control!?!?!?! WHAT?! They can take my guns after I'm done unloading my clip."

    Why is the right to shoot toilets or soda cans in ones back yard with a 100 round AR-15 more important than the security of our society?
    "Clip"

    Well, since you don't know what you're talking about, I will humor you here.

    NRA Life Member.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ytman View Post
    Cite five footnotes please it'll be great to hear some good brought by a fully automatic assault weapon in the civilian sector. Don't count off duty police officers though.
    Uh, you mean semi-automatic? You can own fully automatic weapons, but an automatic refers to the action/ejection, not the rate of fire. Maybe if you knew what the FOPA Hughes Amendment was you may have a leg to stand on, but since you seem to believe anyone can own a machine gun, you're off target severely. Very few Americans may purchase a Fully Automatic weapon, let alone own one. Sure, many may modify their weapons to fire fully-automatic, but what a law abiding person does with their legally purchased weapon is honestly not very much of my business.

    Despite the allusion to anecdotal evidence Self-Defense is not my question and I'm not even saying you shouldn't be able to defend yourself.
    So the entire 1 page section of American Riflemen about people defending themselves with firearms is just coincidence, right?

    One interesting thing is that in Japan, where fire arm possession is illegal, how many of these terrible psychopaths resort to illegally obtained assault weapons as a weapon of choice?
    Cool story. I don't care about Japan's internal policies, since I live in America and am protected by the Bill of Rights.

    I digress, the OP says; when does control become a synonymy for ban?
    Gun control is often misconstrued as bans. Many operate under the illusion that "anyone" can get a gun - that's simply not true. And that's the way it should be.

    Why are cars more controlled than guns? Cars provide a function daily for all of societies inhabitants and guns provide a means to an end.
    Cars are used by many, many more people. Statistically, you're more likely to die due to vehicular mishap than a firearm.

    Many people still use firearms on a daily basis as part of their daily life. I know, you probably live in the suburbs, but they're very important tools for many in America.

    If I'm making assumptions it's only because you feel the need to do so yourself.
    Skud

  12.  

  13. #7
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation First ClassVeteranTagger Second Class10000 Experience Points

    Kwalc's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    2,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    I live in Holland. Selling guns to the general public BANNED. Yes, the word americans dislike so much.

    There hasnt been a mass psychopatic shooting like the are in the states.

    Some people: " oh, but I have a right to defend myself".

    Well duh. Same as every other person in the world and you know what? The vast majority of the world prohibit gun sales and you very seldomnly see shootings of this magnitude.

    I live in Holland and dont own a firearm, but I am safer because not every maniac on the street can go purchase a weapon to do a mass murder.

    Yes, keep thinking "I" instead of thinking "we the people".

  14.  
  15. #8
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entryTagger Second Class

    Harlequin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Chasing an inside straight
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,093
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kwalc View Post
    I live in Holland. Selling guns to the general public BANNED. Yes, the word americans dislike so much.

    There hasnt been a mass psychopatic shooting like the are in the states.

    Some people: " oh, but I have a right to defend myself".
    Guess you missed this one....

    http://www.rnw.nl/english/article/gu...mok-dutch-town

    It's a shame those victims weren't allowed to legally own and carry concealed, they might have been able to defend themselves.

    Since cars were brought up before....

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_at...h_Royal_Family

    Glad you guys like your bicycles so much in Holland, I think they should ban all the cars so you'd all be much safer. Point is, people have been killing each other since people existed. Madmen will find a way, firearms or no.

    You keep thinking "I", and I'll keep thinking "shall not be infringed" doesn't have an asterisk at the end of it.

  16.  
  17. #9
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation First ClassVeteran10000 Experience Points

    johnflenaly's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,203
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    Ill bite, the man walked into a crowded theater and gunned down 50+ people, how many laws did he violate. The explosives in his apartment, how many more LAWS violated. Even if the AR15 he owned was banned can you say with any sort of authority that he wouldn't have violated that law and gotten one anyway.

    Remember this one off hand
    http://gunssavelives.net/self-defens...o-defend-home/
    You can't have any sacred cows if you want to make a really great game. Unless you're making a game about killing sacred cows. That's okay. Matt Higby

  18.  

  19. #10
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupVeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry

    Skud's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Age
    24
    Posts
    8,333
    Blog Entries
    20
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    I'll just post these handy well sourced infographics for you all...





    Skud

  20.  
  21. #11
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation First ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures

    Jeepo's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Northern Ireland, UK
    Posts
    7,835
    Blog Entries
    4
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    Nice to see Northern Ireland buck the trend there. I would argue though that there are more guns here than that graph would seem to show, just maybe not held legally......

    I live in the UK and am VERY lucky to still have gun permits. We have no NRA or equivilant here, and all guns were more or less banned after the Dunblane school massacre. The government on an annual basis try to take my licenses but I annual tell them to bugger off. Luckily I get special dispensation to own what I own, and again that phrase "My cold dead hand" does come into my mind. But I think that phrase only makes sense to those of us who has ever had to fire a gun in anger and in self defence of myself and my family. Ask me this question before that incident and I may well have answered differently. Either way it makes no matter, Northern Ireland being the way it is there are numerious "unofficial" old British Army caches hidden away in places you only hear about in certain parties, but then there are terrorist ones too. That is what happens when no one trusts each other, both sides realise if it breaks down it will go back worse than ever.

    Anyway, I think having guns made it safer. If you ever need to have it and don't you are in trouble, as you are trusting your life to an external, unpredictable person, motives unknown. I will finish with this phrase.

    It is better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

    Quote Originally Posted by Britt
    Push your chips into the middle of the table boys. Ride or die. Stats and rank have become a cancer. We are the cure.

  22.  
  23. #12
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupVeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry

    Skud's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Age
    24
    Posts
    8,333
    Blog Entries
    20
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kwalc View Post

    Well duh. Same as every other person in the world and you know what? The vast majority of the world prohibit gun sales and you very seldomnly see shootings of this magnitude.

    I live in Holland and dont own a firearm, but I am safer because not every maniac on the street can go purchase a weapon to do a mass murder.
    I'm glad you're generally safe where you live, but you seem to have missed a key point about the 2nd Amendment here in America...



    In your country, you may be slightly safer from a mass shooting - maybe. But you're probably not much safer from average street crimes like mugging or assault. But see, you've completely ignored one of the key reasons we have our 2nd Amendment rights in America: The Government. Our forefathers didn't just put the 2nd Amendment in the Bill of Rights because of national defense or practicality - No, it's part of our checks and balances. We have the right to overthrow unjust government in this country. Can you say the same for yours? If things ever get bad enough, we have the firepower to topple a dictator. We have the firepower to stop the federal government from doing whatever it pleases. We have the firepower to repel invaders - as the Japanese knew in World War II.

    I'm glad you trust your government to always be there for you, protect you, and stop bad people from doing bad things - but America is a very different country. You fail to grasp why we have the 2nd Amendment in the first place - to preserve life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

    We don't have the 2nd Amendment to shoot up malls, or schools, or school board meetings. We have it to protect ourselves. Not only from eachother, but from our own government if the time ever came. Tyranny is not something you just see on the news in some 3rd world country. Tyranny can be in a suit, waving a countries flag. We've seen this time and time again throughout history. We have insurance. Do you?

    I will continue to think about MY INDIVIDUAL God given rights, and not the collective "we the people." We are united, sure, but collectivism is a foolish stance when it comes to individual rights, the law, the constitution, or otherwise. Whether or not you choose to believe in God is not the discussion, it is however important that you realize that self defense, against any threat, is a right that no government should ever take away without just cause. And as the image has shown, what one country has called just cause in the past has been excuse for genocide, religious persecution, political execution, and government control of the individual.

    Banning things does not stop those wishing to do evil from carrying out their plans. I'm pretty sure a lot of the things Mr. Holmes purchased to make bombs and boobytraps were not exactly legal either, but you seem to think all criminals are stupid and simply can't get their hands on what they need. Bad people do bad things. Bad people will almost always do whatever is necessary to do those bad things.

    Skud

  24.  

  25. #13
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Blog entryTagger Second Class

    Ytman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,689
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    Topic derailed. Nice.

    OP was about regulation not restriction. Why does the talk about regulation equate to violent remarks like, "I'll unload my gun before they do."

    You have your infographs and your nice little 'Gun control is SATAN' mantras but when good people die because you need to have an assault rifle in the back yard to shoot toilets... well thanks. You can say this and that about third world despots but this is the first world and the status quo is not the same.

    I wont own a gun and I'll live a perfectly nice life until a gun owner decides to end it for me.
    Last edited by Ytman; 07-22-2012 at 06:05 PM. Reason: inappropriate
    "a man cannot just be; he can only be what he is by doing what he does,"
    'Virtue and the Moral Life'
    Bernard Mayo

  26.  
  27. #14
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures

    Mindkill's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Michigan - Defending my objective
    Age
    43
    Posts
    3,143
    Blog Entries
    4
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    I'm curious as to what you mean by "regulation".

    What regulations do you think there should be on firearms (above and beyond the current gun laws in the USA)? What regulations would, supposedly, make us safer? How will regulating firearms, keep them from the hands of those that wish to do evil deeds?

    And the important question, for me at least: If your perfect firearm regulation was imposed, what's to stop the slide down that slippery slope? What would be next to be regulated? Knives? Chainsaws? Glass bottles? Human hands? When would it stop?

  28.  
  29. #15
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation First ClassVeteranTagger Second Class10000 Experience Points

    Kwalc's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    2,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Why U No Llike Control?

    Quote Originally Posted by Harlequin View Post
    Guess you missed this one....

    http://www.rnw.nl/english/article/gu...mok-dutch-town

    It's a shame those victims weren't allowed to legally own and carry concealed, they might have been able to defend themselves.
    FYI, that shooting had nothing to do with the laws that are in place. The officials were ignorant in this persons case.

    In 2003 he was denied to be part of a firearms group because of mental instability.

    In 2005 he was denied to be part of a firearms group because of mental instability.

    In 2006 he was taken to a psychiatric institution because he was suicidal.

    In 2008 he applied again to be a part of the firearms organization. He was accepted because somehow the previous issues with him went unnoticed(human error).

    So it was basically a human error that led him to being able to purchase a firearm, not any laws or lack there of. It is very sad indeed.

  30.  
Page 1 of 25 1234567891011 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top