Originally Posted by FLooDY

After what they did to the good old Raven Sheild games for the PC and jumped to the console i dont bother sapporting Tom Clancy games ........

I avoided Tom Clancy games since the original Rainbow 6. I remember having a pretty damned decent 400Mhz PII with like 32MBs of RAM, running a VooDoo5 and that game only running at the lowest resolution (like 320x240), then my framerates dropping to nothing when a flash bang went off. This same PC would run the original Unreal Tournament on the high end.

Yea, it's a stupid reason to avoid a entire set of games, but that impression lasted a while. I also played the original GRAW for 360 and couldn't make out a damned thing. Enemies blended in with the background so much, I thought I was playing Quake.

I remember trying out the AC6 demo and forgetting about it immediately. The HAWX demo on the other hand was aces. I wasted a good number of hours on that. I don't understand the "arcade shooter" tag that people keep giving HAWX. There must be some "higher truth" with AC6 that I don't understand. During the demo, all I was doing was spamming the "LOLLERS SPECAIL MISCLES!" to kill like 6 planes at once. When those ran out, I was hurting just to make out an enemy that was close enough for my standard missiles.

Seriously, for a guy who only played the original Air Combat for PSX, AC6 really played like HAWX with more failure built into the game. Digging around I see a lot of people claiming AC6 is a "more serious game," but I don't see it. Unless "Serious" means "cluttered HUD, planes = little dots, and missile spam FTW."