No announcement yet.

Battlefield or Battlefailed? A TG'ers impression of Battlefield 3


  • Battlefield or Battlefailed? A TG'ers impression of Battlefield 3

    So last night after some wrestling with PunkBuster I finally got a few rounds of BF3 in, here are my first impressions and opinions on how the game will play out in the future.


    BF3 is without a doubt the most anticipated release of the year at TG, BF2 and 2142 were the most popular titles here for a long time and with BF3 being the clear sequel it certainly has some pretty hefty shoes to fill. A large marketing campaign certainly helped to whet the appetite and prepare us for what is an undoubtedly huge release, the gaming world was hungry for more as fan-boys fanned and haters hated. Amid much speculation and a healthy does of trolling the BETA finally hit, throwing many a cat among the hordes of pigeons. We finally had our hands on what would presumably be a thoroughbred Battlefield game, a shining light in the swarms of botched console ports and CoD clones. Well not quite. Plagued with bugs, missing features and the tears of hardcore fans the beta opened the flood-gates to a tsunami of requests, flaming and rage. But would DICE listen? Would the thousands of threads on forums and twitter conversations manage to turn the game around into a game we will be playing long into the future? Well read on to see what I think and make your own decision!

    Visuals / Audio:

    This is pretty much self explanatory and should come as no surprise that this is both the best looking and sounding game I have ever played, bearing in mind I'm running the game at lowest of low settings on a pair of ipod headphones I dread to think of the amount of saliva and other bodily fluids that would appear on the keyboard if you happen to be running the game on high or ultra. Dice have once again pushed the envelope way past the mark with this title and shreds any claims that BF3 is merely a 'console port', PC is the lead platform and you wont be disappointed in this department. Vegetation is luscious and thick, locations brilliantly vibrant and explosions genuinely scary. All this helps to create one of the most immersive experiences currently available and it comes as no surprise that the gadget show used Battlefield 3 to create their 'Ultimate FPS Simulator.'

    Bugs / Issues:

    Its difficult for me to comment on this as I am running the game on a rig that is currently less than the minimum required specs, I have run into a few bugs but it is difficult to determine if these are local to my machine or more widespread. There are certainly technical issues in the game as it stands at this point, however DICE and EA don't exactly have a stellar reputation when it comes to release day and I am sure these server issues and punkbuster failings will be patched out in the coming weeks. CTD's are somewhat frequent and server crashes are common place, again I am confident these can be ironed out. Overall, with some patches the game will have a very polished feel to it, as you would expect from a AAA title. The interface is improved significantly from the BETA and many of the issues discovered have been resolved, the game 'feels' better than it did in the beta phase and issues experienced during last months test shouldn't put you off the game in my opinion.


    Wall of text time. When speaking about how a game plays it is mainly subjective and a matter of opinion, it mainly depends on what you are expecting from the title. Let me make this clear, don't join a BF3 server expecting it to be a PR or Arma, you will only leave disappointed. This is by no stretch of the imagination a simulator, what it is tho is a very good teamwork oriented game. I see BF3 as a happy middle-ground between BC2 and BF2, the destruction and feel from BC2 and the maps, vehicles and team play from BF2. I'll break this section down somewhat as there is a lot to cover.

    The game 'feels' much better than either BF2 or BC2, it has more weight to the movement and shooting than the previous titles, no more are you some sort of floating rice pudding (if you played BC2 you know what I mean ;)) The guns feel more lethal, I actually think the gun play is more akin to PR. When you squeeze the trigger you can almost feel the recoil, much better than the paintball feel to previous BF games in my opinion. The animation system keeps the gameplay fluid, especially vaulting over walls and such. I am definitely enjoying the technology they have taken from the EA sports games that blend animations together.

    Vehicles are implemented much better into this game than in other BF's, you feel vulnerable in buggies as you race past enemy positions and you can feel the walls being crushed beneath your lumbering tank. They are much more balanced than in previous titles, I like the way that you can scare off jets and choppers using .50 calls and missiles but you still get a sense of satisfaction when you finally down one. A well balanced game feels like an intricate version of rock paper scissors and BF3 definitely has that feel about it. A good team can steam-roll an un-organised one and when you have two good teams playing each other as seen on the TG servers you find yourself adjusting your load-out to take on changing threats on the battlefield, swapping between stingers and at4's as engineer or taking a shotgun in close-combat. I personally find this very enjoyable, especially in a squad communicating with each other and basing their equipment of what others have taken to create the perfect squad for their situation.

    The spawn mechanics have been mainly kept from BC2, it depends on the server settings and game-mode but in general you can spawn on each captured flag and each member of your squad. Although I believe squad leader only spawn is available as a server option. This has both pro's and con's but overall I think it is well done in BF3. When you clear a flag you need to make sure you clear the entire area as one stow away soldier can suddenly become a fully fledged angry squad hungry for revenge. Although at first you may think of this as annoying I actually think it adds another layer of tactical depth to the game, allowing for squad members to retreat to a safe distance to 're-spawn' his squad. One thing I should mention is that for a few moments after you spawn you cannot do anything and you do not have spawn armour. This balances the mechanic quite well as it means you cant spawn right in the thick of the battle as you will most likely insta-die, again this leads to tactical retreats and re-grouping squads.

    The maps are big enough that you feel there is space to manoeuvre but small enough that you can run from flag to flag, on average I feel the maps are slightly bigger than BF2 but with more focused fighting over concentrated areas. So far I have yet to find a bottleneck scenario that were oh so common in BC2. It is almost as if you are engaging in multiple skirmishes throughout the course of a battle, moving from flag to flag and dealing with threats as and when they appear. I think that you get less of the overall feel of the battle but more tight-nit squad play in BF3 than in BF2.

    Overall I think that the game-play in BF3 is far superior than that of BF2, it keeps the good parts of BF2 such as the encouragement for teamwork but removes the spam and horrifically overpowered vehicles. Like I said, I think its somewhat of a middle ground between BF2 and BC2, although I think it leans more on the BF2 side of things from a squad play and battle point of view and BC2 from the feel of the combat.


    Again, somewhat difficult to gauge at this early stage of the game. My limited exposure to the game hasn't lead me to believe there are any glaring balance issues. All the weapons seem fairly symmetrical and none are immediately 'overpowered'. The maps seem reasonable to me, some of them will most likely be phased out at TG due to their claustrophobic feel, similar to skirmish maps in PR. The unlock system is quite good, definitely better than in BC2. You unlock the weapons fairly quickly and it is the attachments that take the time to unlock. This works two fold as you don't have the situation where a player that has played more hours than you is automatically better due to his equipment but on the other hand you keep unlocking stuff way into the high levels. I like the system so far and although unlocking guns gives you more variety I don't feel as if they are outright better. I don't foresee a race to the L85, a la BF2.

    Squad-play / Battlelog

    The squad system as it stands right now is probably one of my biggest dislikes of BF3, it is improved upon from BC2 but is certainly not on par with BF2. As of now you are assigned a squad by the server, and although you an change squad the mechanic is quite clunky and doesn't work as well as BF2, which is a shame. Although there are squad-leaders they don't have any extra features other than a comm-rose of basic commands such as attack and such, as far as I can see you can't set markers on the map and it basically amounts to a 'go here, kill this' command style. Not great, although with TG's main focus on voice communication I haven't found this to be a hindering factor in teamwork. The voip situation is pretty abysmal, which is why TG has created its own solution which does work very well. From a vanilla point of view you have to create voice channels in battle log which is the website based main menu from where you launch the game, you have to drag friends into the channel and all in all is a massive faff and very much pointless, Teamspeak is far superior. For those of you that are not familiar with KnyghtMare's Teamsync plug in for Teamspeak (all server side, no set up required), basically it automatically moves you to a squad channel with your squad mates. If you change squad, you will auto-magically change channel, also if you are a squad leader it will automatically add you to a squad leader net. All in all it actually creates a better voip situation than BF2 had, although a shame we had to make it ourselves rather than the multi-million dollar development company the outcome is there so whatever. :)

    TG community

    As you would expect TG has taken to BF3 like a duck to water, any worries about a lack of teamwork or similar should not be a concern. We are running a TeamSpeak script that essentially adds squad VOIP to the game, although not perfect by any means it is an admiral place holder that I feel is implemented well. Simply the amount of TG'ers currently playing the game means that you are almost guaranteed to be in a good squad when you join the server, the community has blended well together and I look forward to making new friends that originate from other sectors of the community. In the end, I think it will be the community that will make this game great and I have no doubt that we will.

    In conclusion:

    From what I have experienced so far, BF3 is a solid team based first person shooter which carries the Battlefield series on fairly well. Although its not the all singing, all dancing, second coming of Christ that it was first hyped up to be, it is definitely fun, definitely team focused and certainly worth considering for your next purchase.

    What I would recommend is looking back to BF2 vanilla, not PR. Lets face it PR is basically a new game on the BF engine rather than a mod. BF3 is without question an improvement over BF2 multi-player in more ways than it is not. If you think you would still enjoy BF2 multi-player now then you will love BF3. If you couldn't stand going back to BF2 and would prefer to stick with PR and Arma then I would definitely caution purchasing BF3.

    All in all, I think the main theme of BF3 is actually quite analogous to the game itself. Its new, its shiny, its full of bass but at the end of the day it still has a strong undertone of Battlefield.

    Any questions post them here or catch me in TS, I'll be happy to explain my experiences in more detail. I find the game very fun to the point where it is making me upgrade my PC just for this title!

    Paint out.

    • AtomicIrishman
      AtomicIrishman commented
      Editing a comment
      Re: Article: Battlefield or Battlefailed? A TG'ers impression of Battlefield 3

      Originally posted by Greasy Mullet
      Good write up but I found the game to be incredibly disappointing. Unlike previous battlefield games, this is focused on infantry combat wacka mole with 24 players. Team play features have been water downed or removed while lone wolfing features such as Health/Ammo regeneration have been added. Take away the pretty graphics and you have a mediocre incomplete game at best.
      These features can be turned off now. HP regen anyway.

    • Beinseth
      Beinseth commented
      Editing a comment
      My biggest issue with this game is that I like to sometimes just jump on and play for a few. I dont always have time to dedicate to an hour or more of gaming. But with the constant crashes; attempting to join three or more times, before I actually get into a server; wait in a cue three or more times before I get into a server; really causes me to not play as often as I would like. The browser based gaming experience is also a huge downer for me. I grew up on just starting a game, goto the server browser-in game-and play. This, you have to start this program, that starts a browser, that will (maybe) start your game. Just to get kicked and semi-start the process all over is crap. I love the BF series and would be more willing to put up with the browser based sever menu, if this game was mostly stable. Its not and its starting to wear on my nerves.

    • Mcsquizzy
      Mcsquizzy commented
      Editing a comment
      Yay finally getting into multiplayer (goin under the name Sgt Phlegm, not my account [given to me] :P)! Just the base game. What are the big maps and any tips? Also, what are our server names?
    Posting comments is disabled.

Latest Articles


  • Elite Dangerous: Guardians
    Elite Dangerous is soon to experience a much anticipated update known as “Guardians.” It is expected to bring many new features and mechanics to the game as a whole. These features include NPC crews, small fighters, equippable hangers, and even a tourism industry.

    During Gamescom, Elite Dangerous fans were given much information relating to the upcoming Guardians update. As a person who has been watching the game change, it is definitely a lot to take in. For the sake of the reading audience, allow me to try to keep this...
    10-15-2016, 12:30 AM
  • TG is going to Tanoa - Apex of ArmA 3 begins July 11
    Apex DLC is Coming To TG Servers

    Get ready for the ride to the pinnacle of ArmA 3. Bohemia Interactive is releasing their latest achievement on July 11th featuring a Pacific jungle island Tanoa, a plethora of new features and a rich and long awaited set of assets in the ArmA tradition. will be hosting this content upon release. We will be churning out missions immediately!

    Tanoa alone is impressive, with 5 airports, its single main island, four minor islands and a bunch of “mini” islands it’s set to expand the ArmA empire to include much more land/sea battle capabilities and add elements of small island south pacific tropical exotic-ness to the ArmA franchise.

    Covering over 100 square Kilometers (about one third of the original ArmA Altis map) it is a tropical island paradise. Set in an idyllic setting it’s not militarized like Stratis, Altis or many other maps and this one is truly a clear slate for scenarios. With that said it’s not without its history, exploited for its rich mining productivity the island has been industrialized and ravaged for what looks like decades. There is a new faction, "The Syndikat", a local criminal organization with deep roots on Tanoa. This initial primary faction is made up of armed thugs and ex-paramilitaries, and is involved in many illicit operations throughout the region. Armed with mostly ‘classic’ weaponry such as AKs, RPGs, and 9 mm pistols their knowledge of the island and local hiding spots will make them a formidable enemy when the DLC is released.
    07-11-2016, 06:00 AM
  • Exciting CitizenCon Reveals and How Trolls Helped Push the Community Over 1M Backers

    Some People Live Under Bridges

    There has long been a small but ongoing undercurrent of Star Citizen criticism in some corners of the internet, mostly consisting of (IMO, baseless) accusations of "vaporware", "scam", etc. Apparently, in at least one case (Derek Smart) they have gotten so bad recently that Chris Roberts felt the need to publicly reply. Prior to this, I had never even heard of Derek Smart, but it didn't take me much research to find out that the guy is basically a professional troll. Apparently, once upon a time he had developed a couple games, that many people panned as unfinished and pretty bad in general. So, unable to achieve success on his own, he has apparently turned to latching onto more successful projects in a sad attempt at keeping his own name relevant. And seeing as how I had never heard of him prior to this drama, I suppose successful troll is successful. Although I really can't get my head around why anyone would set out to make that sort of name for themselves.
    10-19-2015, 06:41 AM
  • Elite: Dangerous - Horizons

    Frontier Developments released Elite: Dangerous last year and is now getting ready to release a new season of updates entitled Horizons. That’s right, I said season, not expansion. Frontier has been releasing new features and updates to the game on a periodic basis over a long window of time that they refer to as a "season". The base game released as a single season and we saw a few new features, ships, and other items added to the game.

    If you have been paying attention to the game, you might have seen that some of these updates included the ability to form wings with other players (Wings Update), the ability to pledge with and support a minor power (Powerplay Update), the upcoming area combat (CQC Update), and eventually the Ships update which will bring the current total number of ships up to 30; or 31 depending on if you have Horizons coming to you in some fashion. This will bring Season One (or up to patch 1.5) to an end. Don’t worry if you did not buy Horizons, they will still patch and update the base game and you will still be able to play. You will just not get to enjoy some of the newer features that this new season will bring.
    10-15-2015, 10:37 AM
  • ArmA Insurgency New Life and New Blood on Altis
    "Pandora: The Insurgency" Unique version hosted at TG

    Keen on tactics and strong team based play? Stop by’s Insurgency server for ArmA 3 and join the team as we take on the insurgents on Altis. It’s a 24/7 job. No MODs and no requirements to get in on some amazing ArmA 3 action. Join us today!!

    Built on a persistent framework it calls troops to join in the fight to clear the island of Altis of a scourge of insurgents. These aren’t your average insurgents; they possess skills and weaponry that keeps the best squads on their toes. Their flanking tactics and relentless aggression are legendary. Anti-armor capabilities that keep the armor in the rear and, squads need to take special note that “noise” in a region with other enemy cells nearby may cause those cells to activate and respond to the threat. So small cells that seem “easy” to clear suddenly become beehives of insurgents attacking and flanking a small expeditionary force....
    09-24-2015, 02:47 PM
  • Project Reality Server is Back!
    As some of you saw today, the PR server is back online!

    We will be running the server on a part-time basis, most likely 3 days/nights a week, possibly 4. It is our opinion that this will work best in lieu of running the server 24/7 and having it sit empty most of the day. Additionally, the last time we tried to re-boot the server, we had big issues with getting people to help the seed the server. It is our hope that with a schedule that is known for the week, everyone will look forward to the days that server is up (much like we all looked forward to Thursday password nights) and the server will be full very quickly.

    So, what's the schedule? Great question! We don't know yet. The admin team will make a post later this week with specific dates and times, but the weekend is a pretty safe bet for right now.

    In the meantime, if you have any questions or suggestions, please get a hold of the admin team in the Contact An Admin forum.

    Look forward to seeing everyone on the battlefield!
    07-20-2015, 09:39 AM