Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New graphics card, crummy performance

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New graphics card, crummy performance

    I just bought an MSI FX5600 TD128 to replace a 64MB card, but I get no better performance at all. I've spent all day downloading latest drivers, fiddling with this and that...

    My motherboard has an AGP4x and the card is 8x, but there should still be a significant increase, no? Twice the memory and a faster chipset? I'm getting high 20's to mid 30's fps on 1600x1024 with all settings on minimum. GUH!

    Please help! Any suggestions?

    Thanks!

    leejo

  • #2
    What's the processor? It may be the bottleneck in your system.

    1600x1024? That's an odd resolution. What game is this? Don't expect the highest resolution if you're playing RvS or any other recent game.

    - It's who you game with.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm runing an AMD1.2XP with 512 MB RAM playing GR. The resolution is pretty high but the point is that I'm getting the same frame rates as before. Do you think the CPU is a bottleneck in this case?

      Oops..1600x1200x32 is the resolution actually.

      Thanks!

      Comment


      • #4
        Well you could always turn the res down.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by _Ender_
          Well you could always turn the res down.
          But I'd only do that if framerates are actually causing problems...

          What exactly is your fps anyway, leejo?
          Become a supporting member!
          Buy a Tactical Duck!
          Take the world's smallest political quiz! "I was touched by His Noodly Appendage."
          TacticalGamer TX LAN/BBQ Veteran:

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi all. Thanks for the responses. The FPS depends on the background, but it tends to be in the 20's to 40's.

            I could turn my res down, but I'm really interested in understanding why the old card with half the memory got the same performance as this new card, and what I need to do to get this card performing up to its potential.

            Thanks for any ideas!

            leejo

            Comment


            • #7
              Isnt the recommended for GR something like a 1 gig anyway? So I would imagine that to play at that res you will need a better cpu.

              Comment


              • #8
                I would say that the CPU is the bottleneck. GR tends to need quite a bit of processing so it's just as important as a good video card.

                Do you really have to play at 1600x1200? I have a 9700 Pro and a XP2400 and play at 1280x1024. You'll probably get 10fps and it should look close to the same. I barely notice a difference between those two resolutions, plus the command map scales to a larger size.

                - It's who you game with.

                Comment


                • #9
                  No I don't have to run at such a high resolution. I want to because a very good player told me that's the resolution at which he runs so I was giving it a try. Also, I feel like I've gotten a new sports car and when I gripe that it only goes 0-60 in 14 seconds just like my old Colt everyone says "what's your rush?"

                  I think I'll be picking up a new CPU soon... ;) Thanks for the advice, all.

                  leejo

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I personally like my games at 1024x768 but then again I'm not a good player :)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Did you know Badger runs at a lower resolution? :D

                      - It's who you game with.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I have a 1.2 GHz K7 as well. I'd guess your performance is limited by your cpu.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          there isnt a 1.2 XP...well. and that card isnt the best, put it on 1280x1024.....1600x1200 pushes an ATI9700pro, and thats 2x better than that Nvidia crap you got (sorry but im speaking my mind)
                          From Adam Webb

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I find that every piece of your comp affects your fps. I had a geforce3 ti500 64meg on a 1900xp and an epox board and i found that by changing my cpu to a 2800 it helped alot not to mention my fsb could now be at 333mhz.

                            When i bought my 5600 with 256meg I too was like WTF, but then when i got a motherboard with the 8x agp slot and duel channel DDR it blew the other one away.

                            So if i was you i would be looking at a MB and cpu upgrade

                            BTW the FX cards are not trying to push the openGL area. They are focused on Direct3D games and such.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              If I understand you correctly, Emanon, for better GR performance I'd be better off taking this card back and jacking up my cpu and motherboard. Then later getting the Radion-stle card. Is that accurate?

                              Thanks everyone!

                              leejo

                              Comment

                              Connect

                              Collapse

                              TeamSpeak 3 Server

                              Collapse

                              Advertisement

                              Collapse

                              Twitter Feed

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X