Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

    No poll - discuss and let us know what you would prefer.
    |TG-12th|mantis

  • #2
    Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

    If the 64 player servers will be CQ only (an assumption), then I would say this should be rush only.

    3) Support game play in a near-simulation environment. Where the focus of play would not be solely on doing what it takes to win, but doing so utilizing real-world combat strategy and tactics rather than leveraging exploits provided to players by the design of the game engine.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

      Depends on what other servers are running.

      I think it prudent to have 2 CQ servers at launch. That is what most of us are here for based on the previous poll for interest in rush.

      So, if you make 2 64p CQ servers a 32p RUSH server makes sense. If you have 1 64p CQ server then a 32p server needs to be mixed CQ/RUSH.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

        32p Rush Only sounds about right.

        I deserve a ribbon for Mortar Specialist

        Artillery conquers and infantry occupies.
        J.F.C. Fuller

        Proud to have been a member of the 5th, 71st and my beloved 19th

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

          I think it should be 32p rush only. TG will have plenty of CQ options available.

          I am curious as to why at least one of the three server wouldn't be set to Hardcore mode.
          -Glycerin256 <-- add me in Battlelog, Steam, Origin. Sig rig MIGHT BE FOR SALE: i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz; AsRock Z68 Extreme4; 16GB DDR3 1866; Asus GTX 970; 500GB 840 EVO SSD; Xonar DX 7.1; Win7x64, 25.5" T260HD, etc

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

            Originally posted by KnyghtMare View Post
            Depends on what other servers are running.
            See community expectations sticky.
            |TG-12th|mantis

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

              32 rush only works for me.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

                I'd prefer the 32 player Rush ONLY server.
                "A real man drinks strawberry flavored energy drinks out of a pink can..............with a straw."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

                  with the teamspeak force squads program, the gamemode squaddeathmatch may find a place at TG

                  EDIT
                  thats 4 * 4 squads = 16 player server

                  so 32 player server would best be put to use on straight up rush mode, I think

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

                    Makes sense to me that 32 player is set to Rush only.
                    sigpic


                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

                      Having frequently played on a rush-only server, my recommendation would go to a mixed-mode server. Rush-only gets repetitive fast. The beauty of conquest is that you have choices. Attack or Defend a flag? A, B, C, or D? Things like this keep it fresh. Rush on the other hand... you're forced to only one portion of the map at a time, down to 2 MCOMs. On top of that, if you hit a boring map, you have to play it twice - once for defense and once for rush. It's one of the faster server killers.

                      Don't get me wrong, rush is great for a higher frequency of intensity and fire fights, but keeping conquest in the mix allows the server for a change of pace instead of repetitive gameplay.


                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

                        I like servers like that though!
                        -Glycerin256 <-- add me in Battlelog, Steam, Origin. Sig rig MIGHT BE FOR SALE: i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz; AsRock Z68 Extreme4; 16GB DDR3 1866; Asus GTX 970; 500GB 840 EVO SSD; Xonar DX 7.1; Win7x64, 25.5" T260HD, etc

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

                          Is there not Small Conquest versions of the maps?

                          You could mix them in together with some Rush, which are hold back by its 32 players size.
                          "The world is indeed comic, but the joke is on mankind"
                          H.P. Lovecraft

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

                            I would prefer a Rush/CQ mix. If it's rush only, it's not going to get any love.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: 32 Player Server - Rush only or Mixed Rush/CQ ?

                              Rush only with a map rotation focused on CQB. I still like rush as it's fun to play and has a nice progression of events. It's the whole battlefield on rails feeling that excites me.

                              I think we should try to keep the same ratio if possible 80 - 85% conquest slots and 20% - 25% rush slots.
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              Connect

                              Collapse

                              TeamSpeak 3 Server

                              Collapse

                              Advertisement

                              Collapse

                              Twitter Feed

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X