Welcome to Tactical Gamer

User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    CingularDuality's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dallas/Ft. Worth area of Texas, USA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    16,861
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Anti SPAM screensaver. DDOS or not?

    http://www.tacticalgamer.com/showthread.php?t=20819

    Lycos Europe has published a screensaver, MakeLoveNotSPAM that responds to confirmed spammers while your computer is idle. It's designed to not be destructive, when the spam server starts responding slowly, the screensaver will switch to a different confirmed spam server. The idea is to use up the spammers bandwidth. The problem is that some internet backbone providers have evidently blocked the MakeLoveNotSpam servers so nobody can use this service... This is disturbing to me for a couple of different reasons:
    1. The idea that a service provider (whether it's a backbone or a local ISP) is going to pick and choose which parts of the internet you have access to really rubs me the wrong way. I know that there are "family friendly" ISPs that specifically market their censorship, but most service providers do not. This is wrong, IMO.
    2. The fact that it appears that the backbone providers enjoy the money that spammers pay more than the happiness of their other customers. Why else would they block access to an anti-spam tool, but not attempt to block the spammers themselves?

    As for the attempt to label this as a DDOS, that's absurd. The program doesn't work that way. The goal is to gobble bandwidth, not crash servers...

  2.  
  3. #2

    DudeMan's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    london England
    Age
    30
    Posts
    2,975
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Anti SPAM screensaver. DDOS or not?

    Quote Originally Posted by CingularDuality
    http://www.tacticalgamer.com/showthread.php?t=20819

    Lycos Europe has published a screensaver, MakeLoveNotSPAM that responds to confirmed spammers while your computer is idle. It's designed to not be destructive, when the spam server starts responding slowly, the screensaver will switch to a different confirmed spam server. The idea is to use up the spammers bandwidth. The problem is that some internet backbone providers have evidently blocked the MakeLoveNotSpam servers so nobody can use this service... This is disturbing to me for a couple of different reasons:
    1. The idea that a service provider (whether it's a backbone or a local ISP) is going to pick and choose which parts of the internet you have access to really rubs me the wrong way. I know that there are "family friendly" ISPs that specifically market their censorship, but most service providers do not. This is wrong, IMO.
    2. The fact that it appears that the backbone providers enjoy the money that spammers pay more than the happiness of their other customers. Why else would they block access to an anti-spam tool, but not attempt to block the spammers themselves?

    As for the attempt to label this as a DDOS, that's absurd. The program doesn't work that way. The goal is to gobble bandwidth, not crash servers...

    the problem with trying to sap spammers web space and bandwidth is this cing, unknown numbers but i am guessing thousands or millions, of offices and regular people are having thier computer used as a "BOT NET" its hard to fond out if you are but it effectivly limits your own personal bandwidth and then uses the rest for its spamming needs, by using this it will not solve anything. its worth a try but i dont think,itll do much.


    www.TeamElement.com

  4.  
  5. #3

    RandomGuy's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    K-W, Ont.
    Age
    35
    Posts
    892
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Anti SPAM screensaver. DDOS or not?

    I find it obvious that this program is an attack mechanism. It's perhaps not as vicious as modern DDoS attacks but DDoS is a broad term and this attack network definiately fits the definition[wikipedia].

    Frankly I don't think too highly of this program/screensaver. It's an all-around bad idea.

  6.  

  7. #4

    Pokerface's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    MD, USA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    5,003
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Anti SPAM screensaver. DDOS or not?

    Quote Originally Posted by RandomGuy
    I find it obvious that this program is an attack mechanism. It's perhaps not as vicious as modern DDoS attacks but DDoS is a broad term and this attack network definiately fits the definition[wikipedia].

    Frankly I don't think too highly of this program/screensaver. It's an all-around bad idea.
    I mostly agree. If I made one of these for my own vindication against spammers, then I'd be all for it. Creating one for public consumption just makes you part of an opt-in DDOS.

    NS Game Officer. TF2 Admin. BF2 Admin / Scripter. PM with issues.
    Tempus: Pokerface is nailing it right on the head. Everyone who is arguing against him is simply arguing against reality.
    <anmuzi> it is not permitted to have privacy or anonymity
    <LazyEye> yeah when I play on TG the server digs though my trash

    Arm yourself with knowledge: TG NS TF2 BF2

  8.  
  9. #5

    CingularDuality's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dallas/Ft. Worth area of Texas, USA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    16,861
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Anti SPAM screensaver. DDOS or not?

    Quote Originally Posted by RandomGuy
    I find it obvious that this program is an attack mechanism. It's perhaps not as vicious as modern DDoS attacks but DDoS is a broad term and this attack network definiately fits the definition[wikipedia].

    Frankly I don't think too highly of this program/screensaver. It's an all-around bad idea.
    It does NOT fit that definition. It's not an attempt to deny services. The screensaver specifically moniters the responses from the servers that they are burdening and when they get slow, the requests are throttled back.

    I have mixed feelings about this program, but I'm very upset at the actions that some ISPs and backbone providers have taken. They're charging money for bandwidth, so why do they care if confirmed spammers are being targetted? Y'know why? Because spammers are a large chunk of their market... They're protecting spam.

  10.  
  11. #6

    CingularDuality's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dallas/Ft. Worth area of Texas, USA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    16,861
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Anti SPAM screensaver. DDOS or not?


  12.  

  13. #7
    Emanon
    Guest

    Re: Anti SPAM screensaver. DDOS or not?

    I just find it funny how they block this screen saver when it only effects those who spam out stuff. Also the fact that they wont block the spammers themselves, Then to top it off the companies create "anti spam filters" for their own email acounts but this only blocks those emails from whom they dont want to spam their clients.

    Very clever, block the spam from other companies and the one with the highest bid gets their spam to snake through the "spam filters".

    Money makes the world go round!

  14.  
  15. #8

    TheFeniX's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,281
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Anti SPAM screensaver. DDOS or not?

    Quote Originally Posted by CingularDuality
    The idea is to use up the spammers bandwidth.
    Quote Originally Posted by CingularDuality
    It does NOT fit that definition. It's not an attempt to deny services.
    These two statements contradict each other. Using up bandwidth of spammers can affect other legitimate users. Most spamming companies use third-party e-mail hosting anyways. In effect, you're slowing down all traffic in order to piss off a few bad eggs.
    Quote Originally Posted by Emanon
    Money makes the world go round!
    As it has done and will continue to do until we either die-out or go communist.

  16.  
  17. #9

    CingularDuality's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dallas/Ft. Worth area of Texas, USA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    16,861
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Anti SPAM screensaver. DDOS or not?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFeniX
    These two statements contradict each other. Using up bandwidth of spammers can affect other legitimate users. Most spamming companies use third-party e-mail hosting anyways. In effect, you're slowing down all traffic in order to piss off a few bad eggs.
    They do not contradict. If you're running a buffet that serves pepperoni pizza and I organize a bunch of people to constantly grab slices of pizza, but to always leave one pizza untouched (so that there is always pizza available for people not in my group), then how have I denied anybody else anything?

    The screensaver stops when the servers start to slow. No service is denied to anybody.

    I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but it's definitely not a denial of service.

  18.  

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top